Search results

Page title matches

• FOISA Section 35 Exemption
  2 KB (338 words) - 18:56, 13 July 2008
• FOISA Section 36 Exemption
  565 bytes (78 words) - 18:57, 13 July 2008
• FOISA Section 37 Exemption
  1 KB (203 words) - 18:57, 13 July 2008
• FOISA Section 38 Exemption
  3 KB (409 words) - 18:59, 13 July 2008
• FOIA Section 43 Exemption
  ...judice the commercial interests of any person. It also includes a specific exemption for trade secrets. * Ministry of Justice guidance: [http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/foi-exemption-s43.pdf Section 43: commercial interests]
  3 KB (507 words) - 03:00, 7 January 2011
• FOIA Section 30 Exemption
  ...one of the investigation or litigation functions that are specified in the exemption. * Section 30 is quite a complex exemption and Departments will need to be alert to the precise terms in which its two
  8 KB (1,158 words) - 14:28, 17 July 2011
• FOISA Section 33 Exemption
  [[category:FOISA exemption]]
  858 bytes (118 words) - 18:19, 11 December 2011
• FOIA Section 31 Exemption
  {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 31}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=FOI 31}}
  4 KB (664 words) - 19:24, 17 September 2010
• FOIA Section 44 Exemption
  ...are repeated below where more than one law / regulation was used for a s44 exemption ...t apply. In the appeal to the Information Tribunal, the CAA claimed a S44 exemption, and this was upheld (ref [http://www.informationtribunal.gov.uk/DBFiles/De
  26 KB (3,485 words) - 14:13, 16 January 2012
• FOIA Section 21 Exemption
  ...[http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/foi-exemption-s21.pdf Detailed Section 21 Exemption Guidance] ...eans-sec21.pdf Guidance explaining how public authorities should apply the exemption in section 21 of FOIA]
  4 KB (560 words) - 14:57, 16 October 2020
• FOISA Section 34 Exemption
  [[category:FOISA exemption]]
  2 KB (346 words) - 18:20, 11 December 2011
• FOIA Section 32 Exemption
  {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 32}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=FOI 32}}
  3 KB (415 words) - 22:02, 4 May 2014
• FOIA Section 12 Exemption
  == Exemption where cost of compliance exceeds appropriate limit == {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 12}}
  2 KB (341 words) - 17:40, 28 September 2010
• FOIA Section 33 Exemption
  {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 33}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=FOI 33}}
  1 KB (176 words) - 15:56, 13 December 2011
• FOIA Section 34 Exemption
  Section 34 applies to information whose exemption is required in order to avoid an infringement of the privileges of either H ...formation has been published by Parliament then section 34 will not apply: exemption is not required in order to avoid an infringement of Parliamentary privileg
  31 KB (4,605 words) - 01:04, 1 March 2012
• FOISA Section 25 Exemption
  ...lable, such as Ordnance Survey maps, journals or books, is covered by this exemption. The SIC say that the market price for this type of information will genera [[category:FOISA exemption]]
  3 KB (417 words) - 00:36, 11 December 2011
• FOIA Section 22 Exemption
  == Section 22: Information Intended For Future Publication Exemption == | halign = left | source = [http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/docs/foi-exemption-s22.pdf MoJ summary guidance].
  2 KB (281 words) - 09:51, 31 January 2015
• FOIA Section 35 Exemption
  ...ments and, where necessary, the DCA co-ordination unit to ensure that this exemption is properly applied; {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 35}}
  4 KB (636 words) - 19:23, 17 September 2010
• FOIA Section 22A Exemption
  The {{ukpga|2014|18}} added an exemption to the {{ukpga|2000|36}} for some kinds of research data. {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 22A}}
  1 KB (215 words) - 00:56, 28 April 2015
• FOISA Section 26 Exemption
  [[Category:FOISA exemption]]
  410 bytes (55 words) - 00:37, 11 December 2011
• FOIA Section 37 Exemption
  ...tionally to outweigh the public interest in maintaining this aspect of the exemption; * In respect of both parts of this exemption, public authorities should be alive to the need to consult relevant departm
  5 KB (713 words) - 01:25, 19 January 2011
• FOIA Section 36 Exemption
  ...departments, this means that a Minister of the Crown must decide that the exemption applies before it can be relied on to refuse a request for information; {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 36}}
  6 KB (981 words) - 16:03, 2 June 2013
• FOISA Section 27 Exemption
  [[Category:FOISA exemption]]
  1 KB (208 words) - 00:37, 11 December 2011
• FOIA Section 23 Exemption
  ...certification procedure exists where it becomes necessary to rely on this exemption. Detailed MoJ guidance: http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/docs/foi-exemption-s23.pdf
  3 KB (489 words) - 17:42, 24 January 2011
• FOIA Section 38 Exemption
  * Updated Ministry of Justice guidance: http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/foi-exemption-s38.pdf {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 38}}
  2 KB (272 words) - 19:23, 17 September 2010
• FOISA Section 28 Exemption
  [[Category:FOISA exemption]]
  624 bytes (82 words) - 00:38, 11 December 2011
• FOIA Section 24 Exemption
  | quote = Section 24 applies to information whose exemption from the right of access is required for the purpose of safeguarding nation ...certification procedure exists where it becomes necessary to rely on this exemption.
  2 KB (328 words) - 19:26, 17 September 2010
• FOISA Section 39 Exemption
  ::(b) would be so obliged but for any exemption contained in the regulations. [[category:exemption]]
  663 bytes (95 words) - 13:37, 16 April 2016
• FOIA Section 39 Exemption
  ::(b) would be so obliged but for any exemption contained in the regulations. {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 39}}
  2 KB (283 words) - 18:05, 24 January 2011
• FOISA Section 29 Exemption
  [[Category:FOISA exemption]]
  2 KB (321 words) - 00:38, 11 December 2011
• FOIA Section 26 Exemption
  * Ministry of Justice guidance: http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/docs/foi-exemption-s26.pdf ...uidance_10_-_the_defense_exemption.pdf Awareness Guidance 10 - the defence exemption] (AG10)
  2 KB (306 words) - 23:26, 12 December 2010
• FOISA Section 40 Exemption
  [[Category:FOISA exemption]]
  522 bytes (72 words) - 00:42, 11 December 2011
• FOIA Section 40 Exemption
  ...l_application/applying_schedule_condition_v1.pdf Update note: Applying the exemption for third party personal data: the Tribunal’s approach in House of Common {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 40}}
  7 KB (1,018 words) - 20:22, 11 January 2011
• FOISA Section 30 Exemption
  [[Category:FOISA exemption]]
  716 bytes (101 words) - 00:39, 11 December 2011
• FOIA Section 27 Exemption
  * MoJ: http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/docs/foi-exemption-s27.pdf {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 27}}
  3 KB (513 words) - 18:01, 18 December 2010
• FOISA Section 41 Exemption
  [[Category:FOISA exemption]]
  551 bytes (76 words) - 00:39, 11 December 2011
• FOIA Section 41 Exemption
  {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 41}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=FOI 41}}
  2 KB (327 words) - 19:22, 17 September 2010
• FOISA Section 31 Exemption
  :(1) Information is exempt information if exemption from section 1(1) is required for the purpose of safeguarding national secu ...tificate signed by a member of the Scottish Executive certifying that such exemption is, or at any time was, required for the purpose of safeguarding national s
  1 KB (199 words) - 00:40, 11 December 2011
• FOIA Section 28 Exemption
  {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 28}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=FOI 28}}
  2 KB (250 words) - 17:56, 24 January 2011
• FOISA Section 14 Exemption
  563 bytes (88 words) - 00:35, 14 July 2011
• FOIA Section 42 Exemption
  {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 42}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=FOI 42}}
  2 KB (246 words) - 15:41, 17 September 2010
• FOISA Section 32 Exemption
  [[Category:FOISA exemption]]
  2 KB (267 words) - 00:41, 11 December 2011
• FOIA Section 29 Exemption
  == Section 29: The Economy Exemption == ...uld be alive to the need to consult with HM Treasury when considering this exemption
  1 KB (173 words) - 19:25, 17 September 2010
• Line to take - LTT14 - Public interest inherent in exemption / exception
  * Section/Regulation: [[LTT Exemption::FOI 2|s2(2)(b)]], [[LTT Exemption::EIR 12(1)(b)|Reg 12(1)(b)]] * Issue: [[LTT Title::Public interest inherent in exemption / exception]]
  8 KB (1,177 words) - 16:48, 17 September 2010
• Line to take - LTT101 - Failure to cite specific exemption section number (FOI)
  * Section/Regulation: [[LTT Exemption::FOI 17|s17(1)(b)]] * Issue: [[LTT Title::Failure to cite specific exemption section number]]
  4 KB (553 words) - 18:15, 17 September 2010
• Line to take - LTT63 - Failure to specify an exemption / exception on which the PA later relies
  * Section/Regulation: [[LTT Exemption::FOI 17|s17(1)(b)]], [[LTT Exemption::EIR 14(3)|reg 14(3)]] * Issue: [[LTT Title::Failure to specify an exemption / exception on which the PA later relies]]
  6 KB (890 words) - 17:52, 17 September 2010
• Line to take - LTT148 - Public interest arguments presented in favour of maintaining a relevant exemption for withholding information on lobbyists
  ...emption::FOI 36|s36]], [[LTT Exemption::EIR 12(4)(e)|reg 12(4)(e)]], [[LTT Exemption::EIR 12(5)(f)|reg 12(5)(f)]] ...e::Public interest arguments presented in favour of maintaining a relevant exemption for withholding information on lobbyists]]]
  31 KB (4,987 words) - 15:43, 25 July 2011

Page text matches

• FS50094496
  ...on in section 43(2) was engaged but the public interest in maintaining the exemption did not outweigh the public interest in disclosing the information and the
  774 bytes (111 words) - 23:25, 15 May 2010
• FS50122585
  ...able to other information, but that the public interest in maintaining the exemption does not outweigh that in disclosing the information in this instance.
  866 bytes (130 words) - 23:28, 15 May 2010
• FS50201819
  ...42(1) exemption correctly and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information. This decision
  872 bytes (123 words) - 23:38, 15 May 2010
• FS50203844
  ...at section 35 was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissio
  917 bytes (131 words) - 23:38, 15 May 2010
• Absolute exemptions
  Where an absolute exemption is applied to information, a public authority is not required to go on to c There may be cases where the authority has mistakenly applied an absolute exemption, so it is worth checking the guidance and relevant decision notices.
  529 bytes (82 words) - 15:12, 14 July 2008
• FS50155395
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was therefore not engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (216 words) - 01:55, 28 July 2010
• FS50155418
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
  1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155423
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
  1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155424
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
  1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50139804
  ...s satisfied that the public authority has correctly applied the section 42 exemption and the public interest test correctly.
  763 bytes (108 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• FS50157117
  ...the exemption was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissio
  787 bytes (111 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50133972
  ...the Act was engaged and that the public interest favoured maintaining the exemption.
  913 bytes (137 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• FS50155417
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
  1 KB (208 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155416
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
  1 KB (211 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50157702
  ...ction 35(1)(a) was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissio
  1 KB (149 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155388
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
  1 KB (210 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155420
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
  1 KB (215 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155428
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
  1 KB (228 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50200694
  ...ic interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs that in disclosure. The exemption at section 31(1) has therefore not been further considered. The complaint i
  866 bytes (120 words) - 23:37, 15 May 2010
• FS50200695
  ...ic interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs that in disclosure. The exemption at section 31(1) has therefore not been further considered. The complaint i
  863 bytes (121 words) - 23:37, 15 May 2010
• FS50126145
  ...sted information with the public interest favouring the maintenance of the exemption. An appeal was made to the Information Tribunal but the Tribunal has ruled
  861 bytes (128 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• EIR 12(5)(c)
  ''' EIR 12(5)(c) exemption - intellectual property rights ''' {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=EIR 12(5)(c)}}
  284 bytes (34 words) - 19:34, 17 September 2010
• EIR 12(4)(d)
  ''' EIR 12(4)(d) exemption - unfinished/incomplete data ''' {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=EIR 12(4)(d)}}
  282 bytes (34 words) - 19:33, 17 September 2010
• FS50092311
  ...the Act was engaged and that the public interest favoured maintaining the exemption.
  1 KB (170 words) - 23:25, 15 May 2010
• FS50075765
  ...icable to the information, and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure.
  939 bytes (138 words) - 23:23, 15 May 2010
• EIR 12(4)(e)
  ''' EIR 12(4)(e) exemption - internal communications ''' {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=EIR 12(4)(e)}}
  278 bytes (33 words) - 19:34, 17 September 2010
• FS50129969
  ...mption was engaged and the public interest favoured the maintenance of the exemption.
  1 KB (181 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• FS50147333
  ...the exemption was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissio
  979 bytes (134 words) - 23:30, 15 May 2010
• LTT14
  #REDIRECT [[Line to take - LTT14 - Public interest inherent in exemption / exception]]
  86 bytes (13 words) - 03:33, 17 September 2010
• FS50155391
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (181 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50098767
  ...tisfied that the public authority was entitled to rely upon the section 41 exemption to withhold the information as the legal advice was shared with it as part
  2 KB (223 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
• FS50159578
  ...)(a) exemption was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information which had ther
  1,004 bytes (146 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155409
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
  2 KB (225 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50103099
  ...losure. Therefore, in so far as the public authority correctly applied the exemption under section 42 of the Act, it has complied with its obligations under sec
  1 KB (154 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
• FS50198733
  ...applies to all the remaining information sought by the complainant so the exemption at section 31 has not been further considered.
  1 KB (177 words) - 23:37, 15 May 2010
• FS50155386
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (189 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155394
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (189 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50092601
  ...h he finds that the public authority incorrectly applied the section 40(2) exemption.
  1 KB (152 words) - 23:25, 15 May 2010
• FS50081402
  ...ner further finds that in this case the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure. However, the Commissioner also
  1 KB (201 words) - 23:24, 15 May 2010
• FS50155385
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (198 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155429
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (198 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155406
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (198 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50068767
  ...gal professional privilege and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosure.
  1 KB (146 words) - 23:22, 15 May 2010
• FS50155384
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FOIA Section 29 Exemption
  == Section 29: The Economy Exemption == ...uld be alive to the need to consult with HM Treasury when considering this exemption
  1 KB (173 words) - 19:25, 17 September 2010
• FS50133903
  ...by the exemption and that the public interest does favour maintaining the exemption. The Commissioner’s decision is that HMRC dealt with the request in accor
  1,016 bytes (152 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• FS50139606
  ...confirm or deny if information is held) and 17(1)(b) (late reliance on an exemption from disclosure) of the Act.
  1 KB (173 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• FS50155397
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155430
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155398
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155381
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (200 words) - 23:31, 15 May 2010
• FS50155400
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155427
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50130128
  ...pheld in this matter, and that the public interest favours maintaining the exemption in this instance. An appeal was made to the Information Tribunal, but the a
  1,012 bytes (153 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• FS50105734
  ...ssioner finds that the public authority incorrectly applied the section 43 exemption. The public authority is accordingly directed to release the information.
  1 KB (177 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
• FS50155387
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (204 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155411
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (205 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155403
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (205 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• LTT101
  #REDIRECT [[Line to take - LTT101 - Failure to cite specific exemption section number (FOI)]]
  93 bytes (15 words) - 03:47, 17 September 2010
• FS50155375
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (206 words) - 23:31, 15 May 2010
• LTT63
  #REDIRECT [[Line to take - LTT63 - Failure to specify an exemption / exception on which the PA later relies]]
  109 bytes (19 words) - 03:38, 17 September 2010
• FS50097376
  ...rectly in withholding the information in accordance with the section 43(2) exemption. However, the Commissioner finds that the public authority initially breach
  1 KB (165 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
• FS50155379
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (218 words) - 23:31, 15 May 2010
• FS50155425
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (218 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50133250
  ...ct appropriately in withholding the information requested by virtue of the exemption at section 40.
  731 bytes (105 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• FS50076785
  ...e. The Commissioner is not satisfied that the section 31 (law enforcement) exemption is engaged. The Commissioner is not satisfied that the refusal notice issue
  1 KB (157 words) - 23:23, 15 May 2010
• FOIA Section 24 Exemption
  | quote = Section 24 applies to information whose exemption from the right of access is required for the purpose of safeguarding nation ...certification procedure exists where it becomes necessary to rely on this exemption.
  2 KB (328 words) - 19:26, 17 September 2010
• FS50252409
  ...red the information and is satisfied that the information falls within the exemption in section 41 of the Act.
  711 bytes (106 words) - 23:40, 15 May 2010
• FS50136509
  ...ed. The Commissioner has decided that the Council was correct to apply the exemption under section 40 of the Act to the requested information, and therefore the
  742 bytes (111 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• FOIA Section 16
  {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 16}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=FOI 16}}
  911 bytes (118 words) - 19:28, 17 September 2010
• FS50107135
  ...ction 36(2)(b) was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing that information at the time t
  1 KB (208 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
• LTT148
  ...- Public interest arguments presented in favour of maintaining a relevant exemption for withholding information on lobbyists]]
  160 bytes (23 words) - 22:34, 11 October 2010
• FS50089138
  ...aged and concludes that the public interest favours the maintenance of the exemption. However, the Commissioner also finds that the public authority failed to c
  1 KB (166 words) - 23:25, 15 May 2010
• FS50155378
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  2 KB (230 words) - 23:31, 15 May 2010
• FS50233972
  ...th the requirements of section 17(1)(b) of the Act in not fully citing the exemption. This decision notice is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal
  1 KB (166 words) - 23:39, 15 May 2010
• FS50200667
  ...lic interest favours disclosing the information or no longer considers the exemption to apply, the information should be provided to the complainant.
  1 KB (225 words) - 23:37, 15 May 2010
• FS50268377
  ...party information. The Commissioner finds that DEFRA correctly applied the exemption and requires no further action to be taken.
  796 bytes (117 words) - 23:40, 15 May 2010
• FS50131421
  ...tion 42 exemption and claiming that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. Subsequently
  792 bytes (112 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• FS50159091
  ...the Commissioner finds that HMCS incorrectly applied the section 31(1)(a) exemption, and he has also recorded several procedural breaches. This decision notice
  1 KB (215 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155412
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  2 KB (229 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50118679
  ...at the public authority applied the Act correctly in citing the section 42 exemption. However, the Commissioner has decided that the public authority initially
  1 KB (183 words) - 23:27, 15 May 2010
• FS50155422
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (221 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50167790
  ...all the circumstances of this case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption does not outweigh the public interest in disclosure.
  799 bytes (113 words) - 23:35, 15 May 2010
• FS50078594
  ...e requests for information, and so judged that the Council had applied the exemption correctly in all but the two identified requests.
  1 KB (184 words) - 23:24, 15 May 2010
• FS50155380
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  2 KB (235 words) - 23:31, 15 May 2010
• FS50147508
  ...terest favoured maintaining the exemption. The Commissioner found that the exemption had been properly applied, as had the public interest test. The Commissione
  1 KB (179 words) - 23:30, 15 May 2010
• FS50080369
  ...mption at section 36 is engaged but the public interest in maintaining the exemption is outweighed by the public interest in disclosure of the information. The
  1 KB (171 words) - 23:24, 15 May 2010
• EIR 12(5)(e)
  {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=EIR 12(5)(e)}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=EIR 12(5)(e)}}
  310 bytes (37 words) - 19:35, 17 September 2010
• FS50086077
  ...section 43 is engaged and that the public interest favours maintaining the exemption.
  1 KB (184 words) - 23:24, 15 May 2010
• FS50246397
  ...ould not be disclosed. It has therefore not been necessary to consider the exemption provided by section 41 of the Act.
  1 KB (196 words) - 23:40, 15 May 2010
• EIR 12(5)(f)
  {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=EIR 12(5)(f)}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=EIR 12(5)(f)}}
  329 bytes (42 words) - 19:35, 17 September 2010
• FS50073979
  ...igh the public interest in disclosing the information, that the section 43 exemption is not engaged, and that the refusal notice issued by Invest NI did not com
  1 KB (230 words) - 23:23, 15 May 2010
• FS50227055
  ...the exemption was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissio
  1 KB (180 words) - 23:39, 15 May 2010
• FS50064698
  ...ns and conducted a thorough investigation, the Commissioner found that the exemption under section 40 of the Act was applicable and that the GMC had therefore b
  1 KB (209 words) - 23:22, 15 May 2010
• FS50076356
  ...gal professional privilege and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissio
  847 bytes (123 words) - 23:23, 15 May 2010
• FS50203092
  ...all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption did not outweigh the public interest in disclosure. The Commissioner theref
  1 KB (178 words) - 23:38, 15 May 2010
• FS50212107
  ...ring the course of the Commissioner’s investigation the FSA added that the exemption at section 43 (commercial interests) applied to all of the requested inform
  1 KB (177 words) - 23:38, 15 May 2010
• FS50093501
  ...re over that material. However, the Commissioner is not satisfied that the exemption has been correctly applied to all of the information and therefore he has o
  2 KB (312 words) - 23:25, 15 May 2010
• FS50155421
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  2 KB (242 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• Line to take - LTT19 - Applicability of section 30(1)
  * Section/Regulation: [[LTT Exemption::FOI 30|s30]] In order for the exemption in s30(1) to be applicable the information must be held for a specific or p
  2 KB (263 words) - 17:04, 17 September 2010
• EIR 12(5)(d)
  {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=EIR 12(5)(d)}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=EIR 12(5)(d)}}
  332 bytes (43 words) - 19:34, 17 September 2010
• FS50107458
  ...at in all circumstances of the case the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure. The Commissioner requires no s
  857 bytes (123 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
• FS50155410
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  2 KB (252 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50080412
  ...interest in disclosing the information outweighed that of maintaining the exemption in this instance, and therefore the council to disclose the requested infor
  898 bytes (135 words) - 23:24, 15 May 2010
• FS50211630
  ...lainant why it believed that the public interest in the maintenance of the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosure. The public authority is requi
  2 KB (250 words) - 23:38, 15 May 2010
• FS50070183
  ...sought by the complainant, and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information.
  855 bytes (120 words) - 23:23, 15 May 2010
• FS50209662
  ...lied section 22 correctly and the public interest favoured maintaining the exemption.
  849 bytes (124 words) - 23:38, 15 May 2010
• EIR 12(5)(g)
  {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=EIR 12(5)(g)}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=EIR 12(5)(g)}}
  284 bytes (35 words) - 19:35, 17 September 2010
• FS50171494
  ...all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption did not outweigh the public interest in disclosure. In addition, the Commis
  2 KB (280 words) - 23:36, 15 May 2010
• FS50128406
  ...on. The Commissioner did not accept the late application of the section 42 exemption, but in any event he decided that the information had been properly withhel
  3 KB (400 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• FS50162201
  ...e requested pieces of information. He has concluded that the section 40(1) exemption did or would have applied to all of the information. He further concluded t
  1 KB (193 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50205237
  ...e the Commissioner considers that the CAA correctly engaged the section 44 exemption and therefore did not consider the CAA’s application of section 31 any fu
  1 KB (190 words) - 23:38, 15 May 2010
• FS50155404
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  2 KB (252 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50132101
  ...ic cases, because the public interest factors in favour of maintaining the exemption do not outweigh those in favour of disclosure.
  1 KB (183 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• FS50205219
  ...ection 35(1)(a) is engaged but that the public interest in maintaining the exemption does not outweigh that in disclosure. The complaint is upheld. The public a
  1 KB (200 words) - 23:38, 15 May 2010
• FS50089784
  ...sought by the complainant, and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information.
  812 bytes (118 words) - 23:25, 15 May 2010
• FS50159579
  ...equests the Commissioner found that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissio
  1 KB (202 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50172096
  ...the course of the investigation the public authority further relied on the exemption contained in section 42 in respect of one of the documents containing the i
  891 bytes (128 words) - 23:36, 15 May 2010
• FS50162459
  ...ct appropriately in withholding the information requested by virtue of the exemption at section 40. However, the Commissioner also finds that the public authori
  886 bytes (127 words) - 23:33, 15 May 2010
• FS50126996
  ...by the exemption and that the public interest does favour maintaining the exemption. The Commissioner found section 42 applied to all the information requested
  1 KB (204 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• FS50111129
  ...hat section 35 was engaged but that the public interest in maintaining the exemption did not outweigh the public interest in disclosing the information. The Com
  2 KB (266 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
• FS50209658
  ...35(1)(a) is engaged and that the public interest in the maintenance of the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure. The Commissioner further finds
  2 KB (273 words) - 23:38, 15 May 2010
• FS50074342
  ...ner has decided that section 23(1) is engaged and, since it is an absolute exemption, it is not subject to the public interest test, and NYP is entitled to with
  1 KB (183 words) - 23:23, 15 May 2010
• FS50076806
  ...section 40 exemption, and to not uphold the application of the section 43 exemption.
  793 bytes (110 words) - 23:23, 15 May 2010
• FS50088779
  ...(i) – Disclosure would contravene a DPA98 data protection principle). This exemption is not qualified by a public interest test.
  2 KB (365 words) - 23:25, 15 May 2010
• FS50130239
  ...ct appropriately in withholding the information requested by virtue of the exemption at section 40. However, the Commissioner also finds that the authority brea
  916 bytes (133 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• FOISA Section 39 Exemption
  ::(b) would be so obliged but for any exemption contained in the regulations. [[category:exemption]]
  663 bytes (95 words) - 13:37, 16 April 2016
• FS50199511
  ...this exemption is engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure. Information Tribunal appeal EA
  871 bytes (125 words) - 23:37, 15 May 2010
• FS50147437
  ...ed. The Commissioner has decided that the Council was correct to apply the exemption under section 40 of the Act to the requested information, and therefore the
  892 bytes (133 words) - 23:30, 15 May 2010
• FS50139215
  ...ot cited by the public authority, the Commissioner has also found that the exemption provided by section 40(2) (personal information) is engaged in respect to f
  2 KB (251 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• FS50090136
  ...o further action, and so has not made a decision on the application of the exemption under section 43 as part of this complaint. The Information Tribunal has ru
  986 bytes (145 words) - 23:25, 15 May 2010
• FS50065361
  ...t personal data relating to the informant was covered by the section 40(1) exemption and could not be disclosed without breaching the First Data Protection Prin
  916 bytes (135 words) - 23:22, 15 May 2010
• Line to take - LTT175 - Flowchart for LTT174
  * Section/Regulation: [[LTT Exemption::FOI 12|s12]], [[LTT Exemption::EIR 12(4)(b)|reg 12(4)(b)]]
  807 bytes (99 words) - 19:17, 17 September 2010
• FS50082255
  ...if the exemption had been engaged) the public interest in maintaining the exemption did not outweigh the public interest in disclosure. He has also decided tha
  1 KB (226 words) - 23:24, 15 May 2010
• FS50198230
  ...at section 35 is engaged, but that the public interest in maintaining the exemption does not outweigh that in disclosing it. Therefore, he orders disclosure of
  1 KB (201 words) - 23:37, 15 May 2010
• EIR 12(5)(a)
  {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=EIR 12(5)(a)}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=EIR 12(5)(a)}}
  571 bytes (73 words) - 17:47, 20 September 2010
• FS50065858
  ...tory prohibition is still provided for in law and therefore the section 44 exemption is valid. The Infomation Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has dismis
  975 bytes (147 words) - 23:22, 15 May 2010
• FS50076355
  ...lic interest in disclosing the information and consequently finds that the exemption was improperly applied. An appeal was made to the Information Tribunal but
  977 bytes (142 words) - 23:23, 15 May 2010
• FS50117045
  ...applied in this case and that the public interest favours maintaining this exemption.
  942 bytes (142 words) - 23:27, 15 May 2010
• FS50172159
  ...t did not provide to the complainant an adequate explanation as to why the exemption was believed to be engaged. The public authority is required to disclose to
  1 KB (210 words) - 23:36, 15 May 2010
• FS50074146
  ...each the first data protection principle. The Commissioner agrees that the exemption has been applied correctly although the public authority breached section 1
  922 bytes (133 words) - 23:23, 15 May 2010
• FS50222887
  ...4(1)(a)(prohibitions on disclosure) and additionally sought to rely on the exemption at section 40(2) (personal information) during the course of the Commission
  966 bytes (134 words) - 23:39, 15 May 2010
• FS50219757
  ...Information Act 2000 (the “Act”). The Commissioner’s decision is that the exemption at section 40(2) is engaged but that disclosure would not breach any of the
  981 bytes (135 words) - 23:39, 15 May 2010
• FS50113714
  ...that section 41 applies to all the information requested. However, as the exemption was not used in the original refusal, the authority is found to be in breac
  919 bytes (136 words) - 23:27, 15 May 2010
• FS50117628
  ...ty breached section 17 of the Act by failing to inform the complaint which exemption it believed applied to the requested information within 20 working days of
  1 KB (220 words) - 23:27, 15 May 2010
• FS50086498
  ...at the public authority applied the Act correctly in citing the section 40 exemption and therefore requires no further action to be taken.
  945 bytes (144 words) - 23:24, 15 May 2010
• FS50086299
  ...in disclosure was not outweighed by the public interest in maintaining the exemption under section 35(1)(a) of the Act. The Commissioner requires that the Cabin
  2 KB (225 words) - 23:24, 15 May 2010
• FS50094472
  ...id and employment at the mine, had been wrongly withheld as the section 43 exemption was not engaged.
  981 bytes (142 words) - 23:25, 15 May 2010
• Line to take - LTT81 - Parking enforcement
  * Section/Regulation: [[LTT Exemption::FOI 31|s31]] ...ly to the decriminalised enforcement of parking restrictions. The relevant exemption will be 31(1)(g) in conjunction with 31(2)(c).
  2 KB (236 words) - 18:05, 17 September 2010
• FS50210434
  ...rsonal data would be in breach of the first data protection principle. The exemption provided by section 40(5)(b)(i) is, therefore, engaged and the public autho
  962 bytes (145 words) - 23:38, 15 May 2010
• FS50068826
  ...ge exemption applies and that the public interest rests in maintaining the exemption. As a result of this section 40 was not considered further for the purposes
  961 bytes (144 words) - 23:22, 15 May 2010
• FS50066295
  ...rticular circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosure.
  1 KB (156 words) - 23:22, 15 May 2010
• FS50117066
  ...rial held under each exemption that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosure of the information.
  975 bytes (141 words) - 23:27, 15 May 2010
• FS50086301
  ...the section 30 exemption and that the public interest in maintaining this exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure. Therefore this complaint is no
  1 KB (159 words) - 23:24, 15 May 2010
• FS50100139
  ...er’s decision is that the pubic authority correctly applied the section 40 exemption in both instances and that it was therefore also correct to neither confirm
  1 KB (235 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
• FS50237293
  ...all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure. This decision notice is curren
  986 bytes (147 words) - 23:39, 15 May 2010
• FS50086317
  ...from disclosure under the information reasonably accessible by other means exemption under section 21 of the Act.
  1 KB (150 words) - 23:24, 15 May 2010
• FS50248665
  ...t the exemption is engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure. The Commissioner has noted som
  1,017 bytes (146 words) - 23:40, 15 May 2010
• FS50237891
  ...17(1)(c) in that it did not provide any adequate explanation as to why the exemption was engaged. The public authority is required to confirm or deny whether it
  1 KB (227 words) - 23:39, 15 May 2010
• FOISA Section 31 Exemption
  :(1) Information is exempt information if exemption from section 1(1) is required for the purpose of safeguarding national secu ...tificate signed by a member of the Scottish Executive certifying that such exemption is, or at any time was, required for the purpose of safeguarding national s
  1 KB (199 words) - 00:40, 11 December 2011
• FOIA Section 21 Exemption
  ...[http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/foi-exemption-s21.pdf Detailed Section 21 Exemption Guidance] ...eans-sec21.pdf Guidance explaining how public authorities should apply the exemption in section 21 of FOIA]
  4 KB (560 words) - 14:57, 16 October 2020
• FOIA Section 38 Exemption
  * Updated Ministry of Justice guidance: http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/foi-exemption-s38.pdf {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 38}}
  2 KB (272 words) - 19:23, 17 September 2010
• FOIA Section 22A Exemption
  The {{ukpga|2014|18}} added an exemption to the {{ukpga|2000|36}} for some kinds of research data. {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 22A}}
  1 KB (215 words) - 00:56, 28 April 2015
• FS50178905
  ...nds that following his intervention, the DVLA applied the section 31(1)(d) exemption correctly and based on the balance of probabilities it does not hold the in
  1 KB (167 words) - 23:36, 15 May 2010
• FS50075781
  ...c interest in disclosing the information outweighs that of maintaining the exemption. This Decision Notice is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal
  1 KB (154 words) - 23:23, 15 May 2010
• FS50066313
  ...at the public interest in this instance was best served by maintaining the exemption. The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has dismissed this
  2 KB (299 words) - 23:22, 15 May 2010
• FS50075960
  ...exemption is engaged and that the public interest favours maintaining the exemption. Please note that due to an administrative error an incorrect version of th
  1 KB (165 words) - 23:23, 15 May 2010
• FS50091688
  ...all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissio
  2 KB (270 words) - 23:25, 15 May 2010
• FS50121354
  ...n 30 was engaged but concluded that the public interest in maintaining the exemption was outweighed by the public interest in disclosure. The Commissioner also
  1,020 bytes (151 words) - 23:27, 15 May 2010
• FS50099755
  ...emonstrable pattern, and so judged that the Cabinet Office had applied the exemption correctly.
  1 KB (175 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
• FS50109031
  ...all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption is outweighed by the public interest in disclosing the information. He ther
  2 KB (263 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
• FS50117046
  ...satisfied that the public authority was correct in its application of the exemption. However, the Commissioner has concluded that the FCO breached the followin
  1 KB (149 words) - 23:27, 15 May 2010
• FS50099691
  ...s a demonstrable pattern, and so judged that Sussex Police had applied the exemption correctly.
  1 KB (166 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
• FS50196977
  ...all the circumstances of this case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure. The Commissioner has attached
  1 KB (170 words) - 23:37, 15 May 2010
• FS50094069
  ...e part of the information which he does not accept as being covered by the exemption in section 42. The Commissioner also finds that the public authority is in
  1 KB (170 words) - 23:25, 15 May 2010
• FS50227776
  ...ed the maintenance of this exemption. The Commissioner also finds that the exemption provided by section 38(1)(a) and (b) is not engaged. The public authority i
  2 KB (234 words) - 23:39, 15 May 2010
• FOIA Section 17
  ...Notice" outlining their decision, and details as to why they've applied an exemption. ::(b) specifies the exemption in question, and
  5 KB (816 words) - 19:29, 17 September 2010
• Line to take - LTT101 - Failure to cite specific exemption section number (FOI)
  * Section/Regulation: [[LTT Exemption::FOI 17|s17(1)(b)]] * Issue: [[LTT Title::Failure to cite specific exemption section number]]
  4 KB (553 words) - 18:15, 17 September 2010
• FS50073129
  ...rticular circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosure. The Infomation Tribunal has r
  1 KB (173 words) - 23:23, 15 May 2010
• FS50090383
  ...0, 41 and 44 have been applied inappropriately. In terms of the section 42 exemption, the Commissioner’s decision is that it has been applied appropriately on
  2 KB (246 words) - 23:25, 15 May 2010
• FS50070769
  ...rticular circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosure. The Infomation Tribunal has r
  1 KB (173 words) - 23:23, 15 May 2010
• FS50156540
  ...was not obliged to comply with section 1(1) of the Act on the basis of the exemption contained at section 40(1) and (5). The Commissioner also found that the pu
  1 KB (157 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50232320
  ...no requirement to determine whether the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosure.
  1 KB (171 words) - 23:39, 15 May 2010
• FS50190528
  ...he Council breached section 17(1) (b) of the Act by failing to specify the exemption in its response to the request.
  1 KB (169 words) - 23:37, 15 May 2010
• FS50140994
  ...est favours maintaining the exemption. He has not therefore considered the exemption at 40(2). The Commissioner also found that the public authority failed to r
  2 KB (247 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• FS50163705
  ...oner has concluded that the information was exempt by virtue of section 41 exemption. An appeal was made to the Tribunal but later withdrawn.
  1 KB (164 words) - 23:33, 15 May 2010
• FS50205686
  ...pe of the requests is held would not constitute personal data and that the exemption provided by section 40(5) is not, therefore, engaged. The public authority
  2 KB (264 words) - 23:38, 15 May 2010
• FS50145663
  ...f the Commissioner’s investigation, the public authority further cited the exemption at section 41 of the Act. The Commissioner’s decision is that the public
  1 KB (171 words) - 23:30, 15 May 2010
• FS50171478
  ...tion 35(1)(a) exemption is engaged, the public interest in maintaining the exemption does not outweigh the public interest in disclosure. The Department is ther
  1 KB (166 words) - 23:36, 15 May 2010
• FS50154913
  ...rest lay in disclosing some of the information rather than maintaining the exemption. The Commissioner therefore requires the NIO to release some of the withhel
  2 KB (266 words) - 23:31, 15 May 2010
• FS50072316
  ...vant arguments, the Commissioner decided the FCO were wrong to rely on the exemption under section 36 of the Act and also that it failed to provide a response t
  1 KB (184 words) - 23:23, 15 May 2010
• FS50168527
  ...y extension sub section (2)(d) of the Act. The Commissioner finds that the exemption was not engaged and has ordered the disclosure of both reports. He also fin
  1 KB (155 words) - 23:35, 15 May 2010
• FS50066606
  ...ainant, the Council incorrectly applied the section 38 (Health and safety) exemption and breached section 17 of the Act. In the light of the above, the Commissi
  1 KB (185 words) - 23:22, 15 May 2010
• FS50128700
  ...der the exemptions. The Commissioners decision is to uphold the section 42 exemption. He finds that the public authority breached section 10 of the Act in that
  1 KB (168 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• FS50073576
  ...uires the council to release certain information withheld under section 40 exemption. The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has partly upheld
  1 KB (169 words) - 23:23, 15 May 2010
• Line to take - LTT65 - Vexatious request for published information
  ...ation: [[LTT Exemption::FOI 14|s14]], [[LTT Exemption::FOI 19|s19]], [[LTT Exemption::FOI 21|s21]]
  2 KB (252 words) - 16:11, 13 December 2011
• FS50071454
  .... In view of the fact that the Commissioner considers the most appropriate exemption in this case to be s.40 he has not considered the application of s.41 in th
  1 KB (186 words) - 23:23, 15 May 2010
• Line to take - LTT107 - No prejudice / adverse effect test for class based exemptions / exceptions
  ...(4)(c)|reg 12(4)(c)]], [[LTT Exemption::EIR 12(4)(d)|reg 12(4)(d)]], [[LTT Exemption::EIR 12(4)(e)|reg 12(4)(e)]] ...rticular interest in order to engage the exemption or exception. Where the exemption or exception is subject to a public interest test however, this may be a re
  6 KB (936 words) - 18:25, 17 September 2010
• FS50197666
  ...id not accurately state which exemption applied nor did it explain why the exemption applied in this case within the statutory time for compliance.
  2 KB (275 words) - 23:37, 15 May 2010
• FS50217416
  ...the Company to disclose the requested information as it concluded that the exemption contained at section 43 had not been correctly engaged in that case. The Co
  2 KB (280 words) - 23:39, 15 May 2010
• FS50208932
  ...concluded incorrectly that the public interest in the maintenance of this exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosure and, in failing to provide con
  2 KB (260 words) - 23:38, 15 May 2010
• FS50095679
  ...tion 33 of the Act applied to the requested information and found that the exemption was not engaged as the OGC had failed to demonstrate that release of the in
  1 KB (202 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
• FS50208265
  ...ioner did not therefore consider the Trust’s application of the section 30 exemption any further. The Commissioner does however consider that the Trust breached
  1 KB (175 words) - 23:38, 15 May 2010
• FS50125011
  ...the exemption provided by section 43(2). The Commissioner finds that this exemption was applied correctly, but also finds that the public authority failed to c
  1 KB (186 words) - 23:28, 15 May 2010
• FOIA Section 22 Exemption
  == Section 22: Information Intended For Future Publication Exemption == | halign = left | source = [http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/docs/foi-exemption-s22.pdf MoJ summary guidance].
  2 KB (281 words) - 09:51, 31 January 2015
• FOIA Section 43 Exemption
  ...judice the commercial interests of any person. It also includes a specific exemption for trade secrets. * Ministry of Justice guidance: [http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/foi-exemption-s43.pdf Section 43: commercial interests]
  3 KB (507 words) - 03:00, 7 January 2011
• FS50172691
  ...Law Enforcement Exemption) and section 38(1)(a) and (b) (Health and Safety Exemption) as the basis for its refusal. The Commissioner decided that the public aut
  1 KB (179 words) - 23:36, 15 May 2010
• Line to take - LTT34 - Responses to 'information not held' cases
  ...EIR 12(4)(a)|reg 12(4)(a)]], [[LTT Exemption::EIR 12(1)|reg 12(1)]], [[LTT Exemption::EIR 14|reg 14]]
  3 KB (469 words) - 17:27, 17 September 2010
• FS50161898
  ...case. The Commissioner has therefore not made a decision on the section 35 exemption. The Commissioner has also recorded a number of procedural breaches in rela
  1 KB (175 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50118284
  ...ity breached section 17 and section 10 of the Act, and that the section 42 exemption is upheld.
  1 KB (188 words) - 23:27, 15 May 2010
• FS50135538
  ...e Commissioner has also concluded that the public authority misapplied the exemption in section 42 to a limited amount of the withheld information. This is on t
  2 KB (318 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• LTT192 - Rejecting procedural exemptions / exceptions
  ...EIR 12(4)(b)| ]] {{LTTListByExemption|EIR-2012(4)(b)|reg 12(4)(b)}}, [[LTT Exemption::EIR 12(4)(c)| ]] {{LTTListByExemption|EIR-2012(4)(c)|reg 12(4)(c)}} ...the Commissioner has not accepted an authority's reliance on a procedural exemption / exception then he will issue a decision notice stating that the authority
  4 KB (641 words) - 02:03, 14 February 2011
• FS50068973
  ...essional privilege but in this case the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosure.
  1 KB (172 words) - 23:22, 15 May 2010
• FS50105111
  ...ded that that information requested does constitute personal data and this exemption was correctly applied.
  1 KB (189 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
• EIR 12(5)(b)
  {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=EIR 12(5)(b)}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=EIR 12(5)(b)}}
  781 bytes (121 words) - 17:47, 20 September 2010
• FAC0065282
  ...ecause it was obtained from a source to which section 32 applies, then the exemption will stand irrespective of the format into which the authority may later co
  1 KB (192 words) - 23:20, 15 May 2010
• FS50098965
  ...ommissioner, the public authority also cited section 38 (Health and Safety Exemption) as an additional basis for its refusal. The Commissioner found that the pu
  1 KB (184 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
• FS50250552
  ...n to the bonus information, as the DfT did not explain why and under which exemption this information could not be disclosed prior to the Commissioner’s inves
  2 KB (290 words) - 23:40, 15 May 2010
• FS50156539
  ...public authority applied the Act appropriately in citing the section 40(2) exemption. However, the Commissioner decided that the authority initially breached se
  1 KB (188 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• Line to take - LTT48 - Relevant and non relevant public interest factors
  * Section/Regulation: [[LTT Exemption::FOI 2|s2]] ...ances of the case, the age of the information, PIT factors inherent in the exemption, and general arguments concerning transparency, accountability and particip
  4 KB (609 words) - 17:41, 17 September 2010
• FS50272235
  ...relevant sub-section of the exemption or give reasons setting out why the exemption was engaged, thereby breaching sections 17(1)(b) and 17(1)(c). The NIO subs
  2 KB (267 words) - 23:40, 15 May 2010
• FS50160909
  ...this and claiming it was held but exempt. The Commissioner finds that the exemption is not engaged and the complaint is therefore upheld. He further finds that
  1 KB (182 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50088977
  ...reach the data protection principles. The Commissioner also finds that the exemption provided by section 41 is not engaged as the information in question was no
  1 KB (194 words) - 23:25, 15 May 2010
• FS50101351
  ...the Act is engaged and that the public interest rests in maintaining this exemption for this specific information. The Commissioner has therefore requested the
  2 KB (280 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
• FS50108125
  ...section 38 was engaged but that the public interest lay in maintaining the exemption and that section 44 was engaged. The Commissioner requires the Home Office
  1 KB (176 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
• FS50137020
  ...erest test. The Commissioner found that the PSNI had correctly applied the exemption under section 40(2) of the Act to some personal information identifying jun
  1 KB (202 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• FS50075956
  ...n the report, but he concluded that the public interest in maintaining the exemption did not outweigh the public interest in disclosing the information sought.
  1 KB (179 words) - 23:23, 15 May 2010
• Line to take - LTT63 - Failure to specify an exemption / exception on which the PA later relies
  * Section/Regulation: [[LTT Exemption::FOI 17|s17(1)(b)]], [[LTT Exemption::EIR 14(3)|reg 14(3)]] * Issue: [[LTT Title::Failure to specify an exemption / exception on which the PA later relies]]
  6 KB (890 words) - 17:52, 17 September 2010
• FS50124612
  ...published at a later date and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissio
  1 KB (185 words) - 23:28, 15 May 2010
• FS50164497
  ...no requirement to determine whether the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosure. As the Commissioner is satisf
  1 KB (203 words) - 23:33, 15 May 2010
• FS50068239
  ...ion 17(7)(a) and Section 17(7)(b) of the Act when it did not specify which exemption it sought to apply to the requested information and when it did not provide
  1 KB (198 words) - 23:22, 15 May 2010
• Line to take - LTT105 - Claims of more than one limb of s36(2)
  * Section/Regulation: [[LTT Exemption::FOI 36|s36(2)(c)]] ...ent to withhold information, but which are not covered by another specific exemption.
  3 KB (538 words) - 19:39, 11 October 2010
• FS50175323
  ...a) is engaged and that the public interest favours the maintenance of this exemption. However, the Commissioner also finds that the public authority failed to c
  1 KB (184 words) - 23:36, 15 May 2010
• FS50229756
  ...held solely in reliance on the section 43(2) exemption did not engage that exemption. He has therefore ordered release of that information.
  1 KB (175 words) - 23:39, 15 May 2010
• Line to take - LTT49 - Age of information
  * Section/Regulation: [[LTT Exemption::FOI 2|s2]], [[LTT Exemption::FOI 63|s63]] ...minish over time. The fact that information is nearing the age at which an exemption ceases to apply is not, however, in itself, a relevant factor.
  3 KB (530 words) - 17:42, 17 September 2010
• FS50192677
  ...that the public interest test weighed in favour of the maintenance of the exemption. However, the Commissioner decided that the Ministry of Defence’s public
  1 KB (195 words) - 23:37, 15 May 2010
• FOIA Section 39 Exemption
  ::(b) would be so obliged but for any exemption contained in the regulations. {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 39}}
  2 KB (283 words) - 18:05, 24 January 2011
• FS50097905
  ...of sections 31(1)(a) and that the public interest favours maintaining the exemption. However, the Commissioner has also concluded that the Cabinet Office breac
  1 KB (203 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
• FS50127442
  ...ound that the public authority had been correct in claiming the section 21 exemption. However, the Commissioner also concluded that the public authority had not
  1 KB (199 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• FS50202969
  ...at section 42 and disclosed the information previously withheld under that exemption. The Council also committed a number of procedural breaches but the Commiss
  1 KB (202 words) - 23:38, 15 May 2010
• FS50120007
  ...ice to the complainant and others. The Commissioner’s decision is that the exemption is not engaged, and requires the FCO to disclose the requested information
  1 KB (212 words) - 23:27, 15 May 2010
• Line to take - LTT133 - Overview of Section 35 & Regulation 12(4)(e) Public Interest arguments
  * Section/Regulation: [[LTT Exemption::FOI 35|s35]], [[LTT Exemption::EIR 12(4)(e)|reg 12(4)(e)]]
  1 KB (170 words) - 15:08, 11 October 2010
• FS50069723
  ...ndled the request correctly and that the FSA has appropriately applied the exemption in this instance. The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and h
  1 KB (208 words) - 21:19, 6 April 2011
• FAC0069504
  ...to the information sought and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. However, the
  1 KB (220 words) - 23:20, 15 May 2010
• FS50194063
  ...ithin the scope of section 35(1)(a) the public interest in maintaining the exemption does not outweigh the public interest in disclosing the information. The Co
  1 KB (199 words) - 23:37, 15 May 2010
• FOIA Section 26 Exemption
  * Ministry of Justice guidance: http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/docs/foi-exemption-s26.pdf ...uidance_10_-_the_defense_exemption.pdf Awareness Guidance 10 - the defence exemption] (AG10)
  2 KB (306 words) - 23:26, 12 December 2010
• FS50101815
  ...T had breached the requirements of section 1, in so far as it had cited an exemption which it had subsequently partially withdrawn. The Commissioner also conclu
  2 KB (311 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
• FS50184888
  ...the Freedom of Information Act applied. The Commissioner decided that the exemption at section 40(2) applied in respect of some of the application form informa
  1 KB (205 words) - 23:36, 15 May 2010
• FS50074589
  ...he exemption could not be maintained in the public interest. Similarly the exemption provided by section 35(1)(b) could not be maintained in the public interest
  1 KB (199 words) - 23:23, 15 May 2010
• FS50150648
  ...se of journalism, art and literature. The Commissioner also finds that the exemption under section 12 is engaged and that the BBC should contact the complainant
  1 KB (208 words) - 23:31, 15 May 2010