FS50145985: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50145985 | |dn_ref=FS50145985 | ||
|dn_date=22 | |dn_date=22 September 2008 | ||
|dn_pa=Ministry of Justice | |dn_pa=Ministry of Justice | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested details of the disciplinary action taken against judges including their names, the reasons for the disciplinary action and dates. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) refused to disclose this information under section 40 of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated and concluded that section 40(2) is engaged and therefore the MOJ was not required to disclose the requested information. Information Tribunal appeal number EA/2008/0084 dismissed. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested details of the disciplinary action taken against judges including their names, the reasons for the disciplinary action and dates. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) refused to disclose this information under section 40 of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated and concluded that section 40(2) is engaged and therefore the MOJ was not required to disclose the requested information. Information Tribunal appeal number EA/2008/0084 dismissed. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 40(2) | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 17(1) | |||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:30, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50145985
- Date: 22 September 2008
- Public Authority: Ministry of Justice
- Summary: The complainant requested details of the disciplinary action taken against judges including their names, the reasons for the disciplinary action and dates. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) refused to disclose this information under section 40 of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated and concluded that section 40(2) is engaged and therefore the MOJ was not required to disclose the requested information. Information Tribunal appeal number EA/2008/0084 dismissed.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40(2) - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17(1) - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
