FS50145985: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50145985 | |dn_ref=FS50145985 | ||
|dn_date=22 | |dn_date=22 September 2008 | ||
|dn_pa=Ministry of Justice | |dn_pa=Ministry of Justice | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested details of the disciplinary action taken against judges including their names, the reasons for the disciplinary action and dates. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) refused to disclose this information under section 40 of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated and concluded that section 40(2) is engaged and therefore the MOJ was not required to disclose the requested information. Information Tribunal appeal number EA/2008/0084 dismissed. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested details of the disciplinary action taken against judges including their names, the reasons for the disciplinary action and dates. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) refused to disclose this information under section 40 of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated and concluded that section 40(2) is engaged and therefore the MOJ was not required to disclose the requested information. Information Tribunal appeal number EA/2008/0084 dismissed. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50145985.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50145985.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision1 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 40(2) | |dnd_section=FOI 40(2) | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision2 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 17(1) | |dnd_section=FOI 17(1) | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:27, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50145985
- Date: 22 September 2008
- Public Authority: Ministry of Justice
- Summary: The complainant requested details of the disciplinary action taken against judges including their names, the reasons for the disciplinary action and dates. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) refused to disclose this information under section 40 of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated and concluded that section 40(2) is engaged and therefore the MOJ was not required to disclose the requested information. Information Tribunal appeal number EA/2008/0084 dismissed.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
