Search results

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 37 Exemption]]
    88 bytes (10 words) - 15:22, 5 May 2010
  • * Main article: [[FOIA Section 44 Exemption]]
    89 bytes (10 words) - 12:59, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 24 Exemption]]
    87 bytes (10 words) - 15:26, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 42 Exemption]]
    87 bytes (10 words) - 15:23, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 27 Exemption]]
    87 bytes (10 words) - 15:27, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 38 Exemption]]
    88 bytes (10 words) - 15:22, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 21 Exemption]]
    87 bytes (10 words) - 15:26, 5 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
    2 KB (225 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...losure. Therefore, in so far as the public authority correctly applied the exemption under section 42 of the Act, it has complied with its obligations under sec
    1 KB (154 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
  • ...applies to all the remaining information sought by the complainant so the exemption at section 31 has not been further considered.
    1 KB (177 words) - 23:37, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (189 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (189 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...h he finds that the public authority incorrectly applied the section 40(2) exemption.
    1 KB (152 words) - 23:25, 15 May 2010
  • ...ner further finds that in this case the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure. However, the Commissioner also
    1 KB (201 words) - 23:24, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (198 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (198 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (198 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...gal professional privilege and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosure.
    1 KB (146 words) - 23:22, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • == Section 29: The Economy Exemption == ...uld be alive to the need to consult with HM Treasury when considering this exemption
    1 KB (173 words) - 19:25, 17 September 2010
  • ...by the exemption and that the public interest does favour maintaining the exemption. The Commissioner’s decision is that HMRC dealt with the request in accor
    1,016 bytes (152 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
  • ...confirm or deny if information is held) and 17(1)(b) (late reliance on an exemption from disclosure) of the Act.
    1 KB (173 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:31, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...pheld in this matter, and that the public interest favours maintaining the exemption in this instance. An appeal was made to the Information Tribunal, but the a
    1,012 bytes (153 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
  • ...ssioner finds that the public authority incorrectly applied the section 43 exemption. The public authority is accordingly directed to release the information.
    1 KB (177 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (204 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (205 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (205 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[Line to take - LTT101 - Failure to cite specific exemption section number (FOI)]]
    93 bytes (15 words) - 03:47, 17 September 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (206 words) - 23:31, 15 May 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[Line to take - LTT63 - Failure to specify an exemption / exception on which the PA later relies]]
    109 bytes (19 words) - 03:38, 17 September 2010
  • ...rectly in withholding the information in accordance with the section 43(2) exemption. However, the Commissioner finds that the public authority initially breach
    1 KB (165 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (218 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (218 words) - 23:31, 15 May 2010
  • ...ct appropriately in withholding the information requested by virtue of the exemption at section 40.
    731 bytes (105 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
  • ...e. The Commissioner is not satisfied that the section 31 (law enforcement) exemption is engaged. The Commissioner is not satisfied that the refusal notice issue
    1 KB (157 words) - 23:23, 15 May 2010
  • | quote = Section 24 applies to information whose exemption from the right of access is required for the purpose of safeguarding nation ...certification procedure exists where it becomes necessary to rely on this exemption.
    2 KB (328 words) - 19:26, 17 September 2010
  • ...red the information and is satisfied that the information falls within the exemption in section 41 of the Act.
    711 bytes (106 words) - 23:40, 15 May 2010
  • ...ed. The Commissioner has decided that the Council was correct to apply the exemption under section 40 of the Act to the requested information, and therefore the
    742 bytes (111 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 33 Exemption]]
    125 bytes (14 words) - 16:33, 6 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 31 Exemption]]
    125 bytes (14 words) - 16:33, 6 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 35 Exemption]]
    125 bytes (14 words) - 16:33, 6 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 43 Exemption]]
    124 bytes (14 words) - 16:34, 6 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 36 Exemption]]
    125 bytes (14 words) - 16:33, 6 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 29 Exemption]]
    124 bytes (14 words) - 16:33, 6 May 2010
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)