FS50222787: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
(No difference)

Revision as of 17:40, 2 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50222787
  • Date: 28/07/2009
  • Public Authority: Independent Police Complaints Commission
  • Summary: The complainant requested to know whether the IPCC had carried out an investigation into one officer and if so requested a copy of the IPCC investigation of the officer and another officer. The IPCC informed the complainant that it was not obliged to confirm or deny if the information is held by virtue of section 40(5) of the Act. Having investigated the case the Commissioner is satisfied that the IPCC correctly applied section 40(5) of the Act.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
  • Section of Act / Finding: {{{dnd_section}}} - "{{{dnd_section}}}" contains a listed "{" character as part of the property label and has therefore been classified as invalid. - [[Property:{{{dnd_section}}}|Find other matching decisions]]