FS50175530: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50175530 | |dn_ref=FS50175530 | ||
|dn_date=24/02/2009 | |dn_date=24/02/2009 | ||
|dn_pa=Staffordshire County Council | |dn_pa=Staffordshire County Council | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary=ctly applied section 21 of the Act to the requested information and does not require it to take any further action. However the Commissioner has also decided that the Council breached section 17(1) as it did not state why it was relying on section 21 within the time stipulated in section 10. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50175530.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50175530.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 21 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 22:11, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50175530
- Date: 24/02/2009
- Public Authority: Staffordshire County Council
- Summary: ctly applied section 21 of the Act to the requested information and does not require it to take any further action. However the Commissioner has also decided that the Council breached section 17(1) as it did not state why it was relying on section 21 within the time stipulated in section 10.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 21 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions