FS50169417: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50169417 | |dn_ref=FS50169417 | ||
|dn_date=17 | |dn_date=17 November 2009 | ||
|dn_pa=Hart District Council | |dn_pa=Hart District Council | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested detail of severance payments made by the public authority, including names, job titles and amounts. The public authority provided some information by department, but refused to give individual details citing section 40. The Commissioner found that section 40(3)(a)(i) was engaged but that sections 10(1), 17(1)(b) and 17(1)(c) were breached. He required no further action. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested detail of severance payments made by the public authority, including names, job titles and amounts. The public authority provided some information by department, but refused to give individual details citing section 40. The Commissioner found that section 40(3)(a)(i) was engaged but that sections 10(1), 17(1)(b) and 17(1)(c) were breached. He required no further action. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 10 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 17 | |||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:35, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50169417
- Date: 17 November 2009
- Public Authority: Hart District Council
- Summary: The complainant requested detail of severance payments made by the public authority, including names, job titles and amounts. The public authority provided some information by department, but refused to give individual details citing section 40. The Commissioner found that section 40(3)(a)(i) was engaged but that sections 10(1), 17(1)(b) and 17(1)(c) were breached. He required no further action.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
