FS50142499: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50142499 | |dn_ref=FS50142499 | ||
|dn_date=20/01/2009 | |dn_date=20/01/2009 | ||
|dn_pa=Crown Prosecution Service | |dn_pa=Crown Prosecution Service | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary=ith section 1(1). It also breached section 17(1)(b) of the Act by failing to specify that section 40(2) applied by virtue of section 40(3)(a)(i). The Commissioner does not uphold the complaint and requires no steps to be taken. Information Tribunal appeal number EA/2009/0010 dismissed. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50142499.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50142499.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 22:08, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50142499
- Date: 20/01/2009
- Public Authority: Crown Prosecution Service
- Summary: ith section 1(1). It also breached section 17(1)(b) of the Act by failing to specify that section 40(2) applied by virtue of section 40(3)(a)(i). The Commissioner does not uphold the complaint and requires no steps to be taken. Information Tribunal appeal number EA/2009/0010 dismissed.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions