FS50137246: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50137246.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50137246.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision1
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision2
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 27
|dnd_section=FOI 27
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision3
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 34
|dnd_section=FOI 34
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision4
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 42
|dnd_section=FOI 42
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:29, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50137246
  • Date: 15 October 2009
  • Public Authority: Ministry of Defence
  • Summary: The complainant asked the Ministry of Defence (MOD) for the 1992 report by the National Audit Office (NAO) into the Al Yamamah defence agreement between the UK and Saudi Arabia and for communications since the report was completed and held by MOD whose subject is the report.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]