FS50136587: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision2" to "DNDecision") |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50136587.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50136587.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 17 | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld |
Latest revision as of 23:29, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50136587
- Date: 22 May 2007
- Public Authority: Merseytravel
- Summary: The complainant requested information about a specific loan. The public authority declined relying upon the sections 36 and 42 exemptions and in maintaining that in all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemptions outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissioner is satisfied that the public authority has applied the section 42 exemption and the public interest test correctly. An appeal was made to the Information Tribunal, who have ruled that the appeal should be allowed and the decision overturned.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 42 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions