FS50112248: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_501112248.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_501112248.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 42 | |dnd_section=FOI 42 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:27, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50112248
- Date: 23 May 2007
- Public Authority: Ministry of Defence
- Summary: The complainant requested information held by the Ministry of Defence about legal advice obtained in relation to its duties and responsibilities, in particular to Royal Ordnance Factory pensioners, following two decisions by the European Court of Justice. The public authority confirmed that it held certain information but was withholding it under section 42 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, claiming legal professional privilege and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissioner has considered the legal advice in question and is satisfied that, while it is not the information that the complainant had been expecting to be held, it is information relating closely to it and that the public authority has applied section 42 correctly to it. An appeal was made to the Information Tribunal, but the appeal was dismissed.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 42 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
