FS50110720: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50110720 | |dn_ref=FS50110720 | ||
|dn_date=18 | |dn_date=18 September 2006 | ||
|dn_pa=Department for Constitutional Affairs | |dn_pa=Department for Constitutional Affairs | ||
|dn_summary=notice requires no further action. | |dn_summary=The complaint requested a copy of a letter from the European Commission to the UK government regarding alleged deficiencies in the implementation of Directive 95/46/EC by the UK. He also requested a copy of the UK government’s response to that letter. Although the complainant put forward compelling arguments in favour of disclosure of the requested information, the Commissioner took the view that the DCA was correct not to communicate the requested information to the complainant. In the light of that conclusion, the notice requires no further action. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/fs50110720_dn.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/fs50110720_dn.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:26, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50110720
- Date: 18 September 2006
- Public Authority: Department for Constitutional Affairs
- Summary: The complaint requested a copy of a letter from the European Commission to the UK government regarding alleged deficiencies in the implementation of Directive 95/46/EC by the UK. He also requested a copy of the UK government’s response to that letter. Although the complainant put forward compelling arguments in favour of disclosure of the requested information, the Commissioner took the view that the DCA was correct not to communicate the requested information to the complainant. In the light of that conclusion, the notice requires no further action.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 27 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
