FS50102023: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
 
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50102023
|dn_ref=FS50102023
|dn_date=28/02/2008
|dn_date=28 February 2008
|dn_pa=Cabinet Office
|dn_pa=Cabinet Office
|dn_summary=The complainant requested all the documents held by the Cabinet Office in relation to the bombing of the Rainbow Warrior. The Cabinet Office refused to confirm or deny if information is held under section 23(5) and 24(2) of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated and has upheld the application of section 23(5) and 24(2) to neither confirm nor deny if information is held. The Commissioner also found that the Cabinet Office�s refusal notice breached section 17 of the Act.
|dn_summary=The complainant requested all the documents held by the Cabinet Office in relation to the bombing of the Rainbow Warrior. The Cabinet Office refused to confirm or deny if information is held under section 23(5) and 24(2) of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated and has upheld the application of section 23(5) and 24(2) to neither confirm nor deny if information is held. The Commissioner also found that the Cabinet Office’s refusal notice breached section 17 of the Act.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50102023.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50102023.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 24
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|2=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 23
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 24
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:26, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50102023
  • Date: 28 February 2008
  • Public Authority: Cabinet Office
  • Summary: The complainant requested all the documents held by the Cabinet Office in relation to the bombing of the Rainbow Warrior. The Cabinet Office refused to confirm or deny if information is held under section 23(5) and 24(2) of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated and has upheld the application of section 23(5) and 24(2) to neither confirm nor deny if information is held. The Commissioner also found that the Cabinet Office’s refusal notice breached section 17 of the Act.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]