FS50099068: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision3" to "DNDecision") |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 17 | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:56, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50099068
- Date: 11 December 2006
- Public Authority: Cheshire Constabulary
- Summary: The complainant requested information related to the number of prosecutions that came about as a result of a particular safety camera. The Police withheld this information under sections 31 and 38. After consideration of whether these exemptions were applied correctly, including consideration of the public interest, the Commissioner has upheld the decision of the public authority to withhold this information. However, the Commissioner does find that section 17 was breached when the public authority failed to issue an adequate refusal notice.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
