FS50099068: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
 
(XML import)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50099068
|dn_ref=FS50099068
|dn_date=11/12/2006
|dn_date=11/12/2006
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 17
|dnd_section=FOI 31
|2=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 38
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Revision as of 22:04, 3 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50099068
  • Date: 11/12/2006
  • Public Authority: Cheshire Constabulary
  • Summary: The complainant requested information related to the number of prosecutions that came about as a result of a particular safety camera. The Police withheld this information under sections 31 and 38. After consideration of whether these exemptions were applied correctly, including consideration of the public interest, the Commissioner has upheld the decision of the public authority to withhold this information. However, the Commissioner does find that section 17 was breached when the public authority failed to issue an adequate refusal notice.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]