FS50093251: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision2" to "DNDecision") |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_fs50093251_v2.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_fs50093251_v2.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |dnd_section=FOI 40 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
Latest revision as of 23:25, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50093251
- Date: 16 May 2006
- Public Authority: Eastbourne Downs NHS Primary Care Trust
- Summary: The complainant requested copies of letters from the Audit Commission expressing concern at the state of the Trust's finances, as well as all information held in relation to complaints about certain medical professionals and employees of the Trust. The Trust provided the applicant with a copy of one letter from the Audit Commission, and in response to second part of the request, explained that information on some individuals, about whom complaints were made, was not held and information on the other individuals was exempt under sections 40 and 41. Having investigated the Commissioner is satisfied that no further letters from the Audit Commission on the state of the Trust's finances are held and that two exemptions were properly applied.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 41 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
