FS50087290: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50087290 | |dn_ref=FS50087290 | ||
|dn_date=27 | |dn_date=27 March 2007 | ||
|dn_pa=Export Credits Guarantee Department | |dn_pa=Export Credits Guarantee Department | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant said that the Export Credits Guarantee Department (ECGD) had refused its request for information about support given to BAE Systems (BAES), including a list of each of the BAES projects that ECGD supported, together with: the date the support was given; the type of insurance or guarantees given; the original amount; and, the then current exposure, if any. The Commissioner decided that, in refusing the request, ECGD had dealt with it in accordance with the requirements of the Act. An appeal was made to the Information Tribunal but was later withdrawn. | |dn_summary=The complainant said that the Export Credits Guarantee Department (ECGD) had refused its request for information about support given to BAE Systems (BAES), including a list of each of the BAES projects that ECGD supported, together with: the date the support was given; the type of insurance or guarantees given; the original amount; and, the then current exposure, if any. The Commissioner decided that, in refusing the request, ECGD had dealt with it in accordance with the requirements of the Act. An appeal was made to the Information Tribunal but was later withdrawn. | ||
Latest revision as of 23:24, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50087290
- Date: 27 March 2007
- Public Authority: Export Credits Guarantee Department
- Summary: The complainant said that the Export Credits Guarantee Department (ECGD) had refused its request for information about support given to BAE Systems (BAES), including a list of each of the BAES projects that ECGD supported, together with: the date the support was given; the type of insurance or guarantees given; the original amount; and, the then current exposure, if any. The Commissioner decided that, in refusing the request, ECGD had dealt with it in accordance with the requirements of the Act. An appeal was made to the Information Tribunal but was later withdrawn.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 43 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
