FS50070878: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Text replace - "DNDecision5" to "DNDecision")
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/fs_50070878.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/fs_50070878.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision1
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 33
|dnd_section=FOI 33
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision2
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 35
|dnd_section=FOI 35
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision3
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 40
|dnd_section=FOI 40
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision4
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 41
|dnd_section=FOI 41
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld

Latest revision as of 23:23, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50070878
  • Date: 27 November 2006
  • Public Authority: Department of Health
  • Summary: The complainant requested a copy of a report into the National Health Service University, known as the Wells Report, which was withheld under section 33 (audit functions). The department also cited sections 35 (formulation of government policy), 40 (personal information), and 41 (information provided in confidence). The Commissioner has decided that these exemptions have been incorrectly applied, and ordered that the report be released within 35 days. The department also failed to respond to the request within the twenty working day time limit.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]