FS50059852: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50059852 | |dn_ref=FS50059852 | ||
|dn_date=18 | |dn_date=18 February 2005 | ||
|dn_pa=Westminster City Council | |dn_pa=Westminster City Council | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information relating to the maintenance of pavements by the council. The Council advised him that the information requested was not covered by the FOI Act. The notice required the Council to deal with the request and, if it was considered that the information was exempt, to issue a Refusal Notice. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested information relating to the maintenance of pavements by the council. The Council advised him that the information requested was not covered by the FOI Act. The notice required the Council to deal with the request and, if it was considered that the information was exempt, to issue a Refusal Notice. | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 23:22, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50059852
- Date: 18 February 2005
- Public Authority: Westminster City Council
- Summary: The complainant requested information relating to the maintenance of pavements by the council. The Council advised him that the information requested was not covered by the FOI Act. The notice required the Council to deal with the request and, if it was considered that the information was exempt, to issue a Refusal Notice.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: dn.pdf
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions