FER0201165: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
 
(XML import)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FER0201165
|dn_ref=FER0201165
|dn_date=24/08/2009
|dn_date=24/08/2009
|dn_pa=Natural England
|dn_pa=Natural England
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information in relation to a dune restoration project at Ainsdale sand dunes in Merseyside. The public authority disclosed some information at the time of the request as well as during the course of the Commissioner�s investigation and consequently confirmed it did not hold any additional information matching the request. After considering the case, the Commissioner is satisfied that on a balance of probabilities, the public authority does not hold any information in relation to the request other than that already disclosed to the complainant.
|dn_summary=lready disclosed to the complainant.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fer_0201165.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fer_0201165.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=EIR 12(4)(a)
|dnd_section=EIR 5(2)
|2=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=EIR 12(4)(a)
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}

Revision as of 21:18, 3 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FER0201165
  • Date: 24/08/2009
  • Public Authority: Natural England
  • Summary: lready disclosed to the complainant.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]