FER0086605: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FER0086605 | |dn_ref=FER0086605 | ||
|dn_date=15/02/2007 | |dn_date=15/02/2007 | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=EIR 12(5)(f) | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 19:27, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FER0086605
- Date: 15/02/2007
- Public Authority: Lincolnshire County Council
- Summary: The complainant requested copies of statements made by individuals about their use of the supposed route of a public footpath. The public authority released copies of statements where the writers consented but refused to release the remaining statements on the basis they were exempt under section 40 of the Act. Having investigated, the Commissioner is satisfied that the information was appropriately withheld although the Environmental Information Regulations should have been applied and the information withheld under Regulations 12 (5)(f). The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has partially upheld this appeal.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 12(5)(f) - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
