FS50170631

From FOIwiki
Revision as of 17:35, 2 May 2010 by Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50170631
  • Date: 24/03/2009
  • Public Authority: Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire Police
  • Summary: The complainant made a request for information relating to police investigations of allegations made against members of staff at Rampton Hospital during the late 1970s. In response to the request the Police issued a fees notice requiring payment of �16,362.50. The Commissioner has determined that the Fees Notice was based on the provisions of section 12 of the Act and not for appropriate charges which could legitimately be made under section 9. The Commissioner finds that Nottinghamshire Police breached the requirements of section 1(1)(b) of the Act. The Commissioner also finds that Nottinghamshire Police breached sections 10 and 17 of the Act by failing to issue a refusal notice subject to section 17 within the time for complying with the request.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
  • Section of Act / Finding: {{{dnd_section}}} - "{{{dnd_section}}}" contains a listed "{" character as part of the property label and has therefore been classified as invalid. - [[Property:{{{dnd_section}}}|Find other matching decisions]]