FS50206742: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|dn_date=18/01/2010 | |dn_date=18/01/2010 | ||
|dn_pa=BBC | |dn_pa=BBC | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant made a request to the BBC for a breakdown of its expenditure of | |dn_summary=The complainant made a request to the BBC for a breakdown of its expenditure of £45.4m on ‘marketing, press and publicity’ from its annual accounts for the 2006/07 financial year. The BBC stated that the request falls outside the scope of the Act because it relates to information held for the purposes of journalism, art or literature. The Commissioner’s decision is that the BBC correctly determined that the information is held to a significant extent for these purposes and is therefore covered by the ‘derogation’. Therefore, the BBC is not obliged to comply with Parts I to V of the Act. This decision notice is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50206742.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50206742.pdf | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 23:03, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50206742
- Date: 18/01/2010
- Public Authority: BBC
- Summary: The complainant made a request to the BBC for a breakdown of its expenditure of £45.4m on ‘marketing, press and publicity’ from its annual accounts for the 2006/07 financial year. The BBC stated that the request falls outside the scope of the Act because it relates to information held for the purposes of journalism, art or literature. The Commissioner’s decision is that the BBC correctly determined that the information is held to a significant extent for these purposes and is therefore covered by the ‘derogation’. Therefore, the BBC is not obliged to comply with Parts I to V of the Act. This decision notice is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: {{{dnd_section}}} - "{{{dnd_section}}}" contains a listed "{" character as part of the property label and has therefore been classified as invalid. - [[Property:{{{dnd_section}}}|Find other matching decisions]]