FS50196748: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50196748 | |dn_ref=FS50196748 | ||
|dn_date=16/03/2009 | |dn_date=16/03/2009 | ||
|dn_pa=General Medical Council | |dn_pa=General Medical Council | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary=tion 40(3)(a)(i). Therefore the Commissioner believes that the information should be withheld. The Commissioner also decided that the GMC did not fulfil the requirements of section 17(1)(b), in that it did not fully cite the exemption it was seeking to rely upon. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50196748.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50196748.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 22:23, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50196748
- Date: 16/03/2009
- Public Authority: General Medical Council
- Summary: tion 40(3)(a)(i). Therefore the Commissioner believes that the information should be withheld. The Commissioner also decided that the GMC did not fulfil the requirements of section 17(1)(b), in that it did not fully cite the exemption it was seeking to rely upon.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions