FS50186249: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50186249 | |dn_ref=FS50186249 | ||
|dn_date=10/11/2009 | |dn_date=10/11/2009 | ||
|dn_pa=Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs | |dn_pa=Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary=FRA is in breach of Section 10 (1) by failing to reply to the complainant within the required timeframe, as well as Section 17(1) (b), in that it did not fully cite the exemption it was seeking to rely upon. The Commissioner requires no steps to be taken. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50186249.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50186249.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:22, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50186249
- Date: 10/11/2009
- Public Authority: Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs
- Summary: FRA is in breach of Section 10 (1) by failing to reply to the complainant within the required timeframe, as well as Section 17(1) (b), in that it did not fully cite the exemption it was seeking to rely upon. The Commissioner requires no steps to be taken.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
