FS50180221: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50180221 | |dn_ref=FS50180221 | ||
|dn_date=30/10/2008 | |dn_date=30/10/2008 | ||
|dn_pa=Imperial College London | |dn_pa=Imperial College London | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary=ith in accordance with section 1(1)(a) of the Act as the college did not clearly deny that any further information was held. Furthermore the Commissioner considers that section 10(1) of the Act was breached as the college did not comply with section 1(1)(a) within 20 working days of the request. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50180221.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50180221.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 10 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 22:12, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50180221
- Date: 30/10/2008
- Public Authority: Imperial College London
- Summary: ith in accordance with section 1(1)(a) of the Act as the college did not clearly deny that any further information was held. Furthermore the Commissioner considers that section 10(1) of the Act was breached as the college did not comply with section 1(1)(a) within 20 working days of the request.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions