FS50169424: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:11, 3 May 2010

Case Ref: FS50169424
Date: 08/01/2008
Public Authority: Information Commissioner
Summary: is personal data and that disclosure would breach the first data protection and was therefore exempt under section 40(2) of the Act.
View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{DNSummaryBox
+	{{DNSummaryBox
 |dn_ref=FS50169424
 |dn_date=08/01/2008
 |dn_pa=Information Commissioner
-|dn_summary=The complainant made a request to the Information Commissioner�s Office (ICO) for the postcodes of all employees at the ICO. The ICO disclosed to the complainant the first half of the postcode but refused to disclose the second half under section 40(2) of the Act, �personal data�. The Commissioner has investigated and found that the information withheld is personal data and that disclosure would breach the first data protection and was therefore exempt under section 40(2) of the Act.
+|dn_summary=is personal data and that disclosure would breach the first data protection and was therefore exempt under section 40(2) of the Act.
 |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50169424.pdf
 }}
 {{DNDecision
-|1=FOI 40
+|dnd_section=FOI 40
-|2=Not upheld
+|dnd_finding=Not upheld
 }}