FS50155404: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Newer edit →
CSV import
 
XML import
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50155404
|dn_ref=FS50155404
|dn_date=19/02/2008
|dn_date=19/02/2008
|dn_pa=London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
|dn_pa=London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information on the commission payments made by investment managers on behalf of the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham (�the Council�). The Council supplied the names of its investment managers and the commission payments relating to one of its investment managers, however claimed that the information relating to the remaining two investment managers was exempt on the basis that the exemptions in section 43(2) (commercial interests) and section 41 (information held in confidence) applied. The Commissioner's decision is that the exemption in section 43 was engaged by the information however the public interest in disclosing the majority of the information overrides the public interest in maintaining the exemption. He also decided that the exemption in section 41 was partially applicable, however the public interest defence inherent in the common law of confidence also meant that a disclosure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner�s decision in this case is that the information should be disclosed to the complainant, with minor redactions. The Commissioner also found that the Council breached section 17 of the Act by failing to provide the complainant with an adequate refusal notice.
|dn_summary=is information. The Commissioner’s decision in this case is that the information should be disclosed to the complainant, with minor redactions. The Commissioner also found that the Council breached section 17 of the Act by failing to provide the complainant with an adequate refusal notice.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50155404.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50155404.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 43
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|2=Partly Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 41
|dnd_finding=Partly Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 43
|dnd_finding=Partly Upheld
}}
}}

Revision as of 22:10, 3 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50155404
  • Date: 19/02/2008
  • Public Authority: London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
  • Summary: is information. The Commissioner’s decision in this case is that the information should be disclosed to the complainant, with minor redactions. The Commissioner also found that the Council breached section 17 of the Act by failing to provide the complainant with an adequate refusal notice.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Retrieved from "https://foiwiki.com/foiwiki/index.php?title=FS50155404&oldid=9362"