FS50068238: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50068238 | |dn_ref=FS50068238 | ||
|dn_date=09/06/2005 | |dn_date=09/06/2005 | ||
|dn_pa=West Cheshire College | |dn_pa=West Cheshire College | ||
|dn_summary=Complainant requested information relating to a proposed move by the College. The College failed to respond within 20 working days but subsequently informed the complainant that the information was held by the Land Registry. Although the Decision Notice did not identify any steps to be taken, the College were advised how to deal with any future requests where information is either not held by them or is reasonably accessible by other means. | |dn_summary=Complainant requested information relating to a proposed move by the College. The College failed to respond within 20 working days but subsequently informed the complainant that the information was held by the Land Registry. Although the Decision Notice did not identify any steps to be taken, the College were advised how to deal with any future requests where information is either not held by them or is reasonably accessible by other means. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/68238 | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/68238%20dn.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
|1=FOI 10 | |dnd_section=FOI 1 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 10 | |||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 21:24, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50068238
- Date: 09/06/2005
- Public Authority: West Cheshire College
- Summary: Complainant requested information relating to a proposed move by the College. The College failed to respond within 20 working days but subsequently informed the complainant that the information was held by the Land Registry. Although the Decision Notice did not identify any steps to be taken, the College were advised how to deal with any future requests where information is either not held by them or is reasonably accessible by other means.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 1 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
