FS50201819: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50201819.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50201819.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 42 | |dnd_section=FOI 42 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:38, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50201819
- Date: 27 July 2009
- Public Authority: Department of Health
- Summary: The complainant requested the legal advice given to the Department of Health (DoH) regarding the proposed implementation of the NHS database (the ‘Spine’). His request was declined by the DoH relying on the section 42(1) exemption concerning legal professional privilege. The Commissioner has considered the application of this exemption and is satisfied that the public authority has applied the section 42(1) exemption correctly and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information. This decision notice is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 42 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
