FS50074144: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision2" to "DNDecision") |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50074144.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50074144.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 3 | |dnd_section=FOI 3 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld |
Latest revision as of 23:23, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50074144
- Date: 18 December 2007
- Public Authority: Jobcentre Plus
- Summary: The complainant requested the number of complaints received by Jobcentre Plus, an executive agency of the public authority, against a specifically named doctor. The doctor was engaged by the public authority via an outsource contractor to assess health for the purposes of considering eligibility for Disability Living Allowance. The public authority originally cited section 40. During the Commissioner’s investigation, the public authority sought to rely on section 3(2) of the Act, stating that complaints information is not held by it for the purposes of the Act as it is held by the contractor as part of its role as an employer. The Commissioner’s decision is that the information, if held, would be held on behalf of the public authority in accordance with section 3(2) but the public authority should not confirm or deny whether it is held as section 40(5) applies.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 3 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions