FS50069386: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50069386 | |dn_ref=FS50069386 | ||
|dn_date=20 | |dn_date=20 July 2005 | ||
|dn_pa=Independent Police Complaints Commission | |dn_pa=Independent Police Complaints Commission | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested access to complaints originally handled by the Independent Police Complaints Authority. The IPCC refused the request citing a statutory prohibition originally provided under s.80 of the Police Act 1996. Having investigated the matter, the Commissioner decided that the statutory prohibition was still valid. The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has dismissed this appeal. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested access to complaints originally handled by the Independent Police Complaints Authority. The IPCC refused the request citing a statutory prohibition originally provided under s.80 of the Police Act 1996. Having investigated the matter, the Commissioner decided that the statutory prohibition was still valid. The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has dismissed this appeal. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/69386 | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/69386 dn.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision1 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 44 | |dnd_section=FOI 44 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:21, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50069386
- Date: 20 July 2005
- Public Authority: Independent Police Complaints Commission
- Summary: The complainant requested access to complaints originally handled by the Independent Police Complaints Authority. The IPCC refused the request citing a statutory prohibition originally provided under s.80 of the Police Act 1996. Having investigated the matter, the Commissioner decided that the statutory prohibition was still valid. The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has dismissed this appeal.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: dn.pdf
