FER0090259: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FER0090259 | |dn_ref=FER0090259 | ||
|dn_date= | |dn_date=7 June 2006 | ||
|dn_pa=Environmental Resources Management | |dn_pa=Environmental Resources Management | ||
|dn_summary=A request was made for information regarding a review carried out by ERM for the Regional Assembly of the North East. The carrying out of such a review is required by SI 2001/1633. ERM did not respond to this request, stating that it was not a public authority for the purposes of the EIR. However, the Commissioner has found that in respect of this specific request, ERM are a public authority and so should have responded to the request under the Regulations. | |dn_summary=A request was made for information regarding a review carried out by ERM for the Regional Assembly of the North East. The carrying out of such a review is required by SI 2001/1633. ERM did not respond to this request, stating that it was not a public authority for the purposes of the EIR. However, the Commissioner has found that in respect of this specific request, ERM are a public authority and so should have responded to the request under the Regulations. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_fs50090259.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_fs50090259.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision1 | ||
|dnd_section=EIR 5(1) | |dnd_section=EIR 5(1) | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:20, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FER0090259
- Date: 7 June 2006
- Public Authority: Environmental Resources Management
- Summary: A request was made for information regarding a review carried out by ERM for the Regional Assembly of the North East. The carrying out of such a review is required by SI 2001/1633. ERM did not respond to this request, stating that it was not a public authority for the purposes of the EIR. However, the Commissioner has found that in respect of this specific request, ERM are a public authority and so should have responded to the request under the Regulations.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
