FAC0063912: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FAC0063912 | |dn_ref=FAC0063912 | ||
|dn_date=16 | |dn_date=16 May 2005 | ||
|dn_pa=Wansbeck District Council | |dn_pa=Wansbeck District Council | ||
|dn_summary=Complainant requested a copy of a report from the Council, who failed to respond properly in that it neither provided the information nor issued an adequate Refusal Notice, even when prompted by the ICO. | |dn_summary=Complainant requested a copy of a report from the Council, who failed to respond properly in that it neither provided the information nor issued an adequate Refusal Notice, even when prompted by the ICO. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/63912 | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/63912 dn.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision1 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 1 | |dnd_section=FOI 1 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision2 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 10 | |dnd_section=FOI 10 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision3 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 17 | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:19, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FAC0063912
- Date: 16 May 2005
- Public Authority: Wansbeck District Council
- Summary: Complainant requested a copy of a report from the Council, who failed to respond properly in that it neither provided the information nor issued an adequate Refusal Notice, even when prompted by the ICO.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: dn.pdf
Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2 Template:DNDecision3
