FS50230569: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50230569 | |dn_ref=FS50230569 | ||
|dn_date=19 | |dn_date=19 January 2010 | ||
|dn_pa=Eastbourne Borough Council | |dn_pa=Eastbourne Borough Council | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested copies of documents he described as having been incorrectly served on a person connected with his property. The public authority has previously disclosed information to the complainant and maintains that it does not hold any information relating to the matter which has not already been disclosed to him. The public authority refused to comply with the | |dn_summary=The complainant requested copies of documents he described as having been incorrectly served on a person connected with his property. The public authority has previously disclosed information to the complainant and maintains that it does not hold any information relating to the matter which has not already been disclosed to him. The public authority refused to comply with the complainant’s request, arguing that it was vexatious under section 14 of the Freedom of Information Act. The Commissioner’s decision is that the public authority was correct in its application of section 14(1) of the Act. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50230569.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50230569.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision1 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 14 | |dnd_section=FOI 14 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:19, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50230569
- Date: 19 January 2010
- Public Authority: Eastbourne Borough Council
- Summary: The complainant requested copies of documents he described as having been incorrectly served on a person connected with his property. The public authority has previously disclosed information to the complainant and maintains that it does not hold any information relating to the matter which has not already been disclosed to him. The public authority refused to comply with the complainant’s request, arguing that it was vexatious under section 14 of the Freedom of Information Act. The Commissioner’s decision is that the public authority was correct in its application of section 14(1) of the Act.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
