FS50129838: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50129838 | |dn_ref=FS50129838 | ||
|dn_date= | |dn_date=3 January 2007 | ||
|dn_pa=East Riding of Yorkshire Council | |dn_pa=East Riding of Yorkshire Council | ||
|dn_summary=require the Council to take any further action. The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has dismissed the appeal. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested information concerning the Council’s involvement with the development of a Tesco store. The Council responded that the information was not held and that it had been destroyed some years previously. The Commissioner has investigated and is satisfied that the information requested is not held by the Council. He does not, therefore, require the Council to take any further action. The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has dismissed the appeal. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50129838.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50129838.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision1 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 1 | |dnd_section=FOI 1 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision2 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 10 | |dnd_section=FOI 10 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:26, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50129838
- Date: 3 January 2007
- Public Authority: East Riding of Yorkshire Council
- Summary: The complainant requested information concerning the Council’s involvement with the development of a Tesco store. The Council responded that the information was not held and that it had been destroyed some years previously. The Commissioner has investigated and is satisfied that the information requested is not held by the Council. He does not, therefore, require the Council to take any further action. The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has dismissed the appeal.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
