FAC0068022: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FAC0068022 | |dn_ref=FAC0068022 | ||
|dn_date= | |dn_date=3 August 2005 | ||
|dn_pa=Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council | |dn_pa=Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested copies of car boot Sunday Attendance Sheets issued by Council officers attending car boot sales within the Borough of Oldham and alleged that the Council did not provide the information requested. The Council provided the sheets for 1998 to 2000 but could not provide sheets for 2001 to 2004 as they stated they did not hold this information. The Council has satisfied the Commissioner that it has not used Council officers to carry out inspections of car boot sales since 2000 and therefore the information requested is not held. In advising the complainant the information was not held within 20 working days the Commissioner was satisfied that the Council has complied with s.1(1) and s.10(1) of the Act. In endeavouring to provide some information concerning the particular site of interest to the complainant the Commissioner was also satisfied the Council has also complied with its duty to provide advice and assistance. The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has dismissed this appeal. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested copies of car boot Sunday Attendance Sheets issued by Council officers attending car boot sales within the Borough of Oldham and alleged that the Council did not provide the information requested. The Council provided the sheets for 1998 to 2000 but could not provide sheets for 2001 to 2004 as they stated they did not hold this information. The Council has satisfied the Commissioner that it has not used Council officers to carry out inspections of car boot sales since 2000 and therefore the information requested is not held. In advising the complainant the information was not held within 20 working days the Commissioner was satisfied that the Council has complied with s.1(1) and s.10(1) of the Act. In endeavouring to provide some information concerning the particular site of interest to the complainant the Commissioner was also satisfied the Council has also complied with its duty to provide advice and assistance. The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has dismissed this appeal. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/68022 | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/68022 dn.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision1 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 1 | |dnd_section=FOI 1 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision2 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 10 | |dnd_section=FOI 10 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision3 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 16 | |dnd_section=FOI 16 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:19, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FAC0068022
- Date: 3 August 2005
- Public Authority: Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council
- Summary: The complainant requested copies of car boot Sunday Attendance Sheets issued by Council officers attending car boot sales within the Borough of Oldham and alleged that the Council did not provide the information requested. The Council provided the sheets for 1998 to 2000 but could not provide sheets for 2001 to 2004 as they stated they did not hold this information. The Council has satisfied the Commissioner that it has not used Council officers to carry out inspections of car boot sales since 2000 and therefore the information requested is not held. In advising the complainant the information was not held within 20 working days the Commissioner was satisfied that the Council has complied with s.1(1) and s.10(1) of the Act. In endeavouring to provide some information concerning the particular site of interest to the complainant the Commissioner was also satisfied the Council has also complied with its duty to provide advice and assistance. The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has dismissed this appeal.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: dn.pdf
Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2 Template:DNDecision3
