FS50117249: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
CSV import
 
XML import
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50117249
|dn_ref=FS50117249
|dn_date=23/05/2007
|dn_date=23/05/2007
|dn_pa=Department for Culture, Media and Sport
|dn_pa=Department for Culture, Media and Sport
|dn_summary=The Complainant requested all internal documents from the Department of Culture Media and Sport (DCMS) relating to the purchase of art works by an individual and the National Council for Art Culture and Heritage (NCAH) in Qatar. The Complainant also requested communications between DCMS and any outside bodies regarding the purchases. DCMS disclosed all the communications it held with outside bodies but refused to disclose internal documents relating to the individual or the NCAH under sections 40, 41 and 44 and on the grounds of cost. During the course of the investigation the Commissioner established that the cost limit was being applied to all the information being withheld and so focused his investigation on this. The Commissioner�s decision is that to obtain and disclose the information in the remainder of the request would exceed the appropriate cost limit. The Commissioner therefore requires no steps to be taken.
|dn_summary=’s decision is that to obtain and disclose the information in the remainder of the request would exceed the appropriate cost limit. The Commissioner therefore requires no steps to be taken.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50117249.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50117249.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 17
|dnd_section=FOI 12
|2=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Revision as of 22:06, 3 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50117249
  • Date: 23/05/2007
  • Public Authority: Department for Culture, Media and Sport
  • Summary: ’s decision is that to obtain and disclose the information in the remainder of the request would exceed the appropriate cost limit. The Commissioner therefore requires no steps to be taken.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]