FS50062124: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50062124 | |dn_ref=FS50062124 | ||
|dn_date=25/08/2005 | |dn_date=25/08/2005 | ||
|dn_pa=Corby Borough Council | |dn_pa=Corby Borough Council | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested details of the total amount of money paid to the Former Temporary Finance Officer employed by the Council. The Council refused to provide the information claiming that the exemption in section 40 (2) applied. As the disclosure of the information would not breach the first data protection principle, the Commissioner is of the view that the disclosure of the information in question would not breach the Data Protection Act. Therefore, section 40 is not engaged. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested details of the total amount of money paid to the Former Temporary Finance Officer employed by the Council. The Council refused to provide the information claiming that the exemption in section 40 (2) applied. As the disclosure of the information would not breach the first data protection principle, the Commissioner is of the view that the disclosure of the information in question would not breach the Data Protection Act. Therefore, section 40 is not engaged. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/62124 | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/62124%20dn.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 40 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 21:18, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50062124
- Date: 25/08/2005
- Public Authority: Corby Borough Council
- Summary: The complainant requested details of the total amount of money paid to the Former Temporary Finance Officer employed by the Council. The Council refused to provide the information claiming that the exemption in section 40 (2) applied. As the disclosure of the information would not breach the first data protection principle, the Commissioner is of the view that the disclosure of the information in question would not breach the Data Protection Act. Therefore, section 40 is not engaged.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
