FS50086627: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision2" to "DNDecision") |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|dnd_finding=Partly Upheld | |dnd_finding=Partly Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 44 | |dnd_section=FOI 44 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 23:06, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50086627
- Date: 30 August 2007
- Public Authority: Commission for Local Administration in England
- Summary: The complainant made a request to the Local Government Ombudsman for information related to a complaint he had previously made against Portsmouth City Council. The public authority refused the request on the basis that information related to its investigations is exempt under section 44 of the Act. The public authority confirmed that the relevant statutory prohibition is section 32(2) of the Local Government Act 1974. The Commissioner has investigated the complaint and has found that, to the extent that the public authority holds any recorded information falling within the scope of the request, the exemption was correctly applied. However the Commissioner has also found that the public authority breached section 17 of the Act by issuing the complainant with an inadequate refusal notice. Information Tribunal appeal number EA/2007/0094 has been dismissed.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 44 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
