FS50078524: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50078524 | |dn_ref=FS50078524 | ||
|dn_date=13 | |dn_date=13 February 2006 | ||
|dn_pa=Tandridge District Council | |dn_pa=Tandridge District Council | ||
|dn_summary=The Complainant requested information from the Council relating to a report written for it by a consultant. The requests contained a number of aspects and while the Council did partly respond it does not appear that the responses from the Council fulfilled the requirements of section 1 of the Act. The Decision Notice therefore requires the council to respond to all aspects of the original request in accordance to the Act. | |dn_summary=The Complainant requested information from the Council relating to a report written for it by a consultant. The requests contained a number of aspects and while the Council did partly respond it does not appear that the responses from the Council fulfilled the requirements of section 1 of the Act. The Decision Notice therefore requires the council to respond to all aspects of the original request in accordance to the Act. |
Latest revision as of 23:24, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50078524
- Date: 13 February 2006
- Public Authority: Tandridge District Council
- Summary: The Complainant requested information from the Council relating to a report written for it by a consultant. The requests contained a number of aspects and while the Council did partly respond it does not appear that the responses from the Council fulfilled the requirements of section 1 of the Act. The Decision Notice therefore requires the council to respond to all aspects of the original request in accordance to the Act.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 1 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions