FS50078524: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
XML import
m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision"
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50078524
|dn_ref=FS50078524
|dn_date=13/02/2006
|dn_date=13 February 2006
|dn_pa=Tandridge District Council
|dn_pa=Tandridge District Council
|dn_summary=The Complainant requested information from the Council relating to a report written for it by a consultant. The requests contained a number of aspects and while the Council did partly respond it does not appear that the responses from the Council fulfilled the requirements of section 1 of the Act. The Decision Notice therefore requires the council to respond to all aspects of the original request in accordance to the Act.
|dn_summary=The Complainant requested information from the Council relating to a report written for it by a consultant. The requests contained a number of aspects and while the Council did partly respond it does not appear that the responses from the Council fulfilled the requirements of section 1 of the Act. The Decision Notice therefore requires the council to respond to all aspects of the original request in accordance to the Act.

Latest revision as of 23:24, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50078524
  • Date: 13 February 2006
  • Public Authority: Tandridge District Council
  • Summary: The Complainant requested information from the Council relating to a report written for it by a consultant. The requests contained a number of aspects and while the Council did partly respond it does not appear that the responses from the Council fulfilled the requirements of section 1 of the Act. The Decision Notice therefore requires the council to respond to all aspects of the original request in accordance to the Act.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]