FS50068238: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50068238 | |dn_ref=FS50068238 | ||
|dn_date= | |dn_date=9 June 2005 | ||
|dn_pa=West Cheshire College | |dn_pa=West Cheshire College | ||
|dn_summary=Complainant requested information relating to a proposed move by the College. The College failed to respond within 20 working days but subsequently informed the complainant that the information was held by the Land Registry. Although the Decision Notice did not identify any steps to be taken, the College were advised how to deal with any future requests where information is either not held by them or is reasonably accessible by other means. | |dn_summary=Complainant requested information relating to a proposed move by the College. The College failed to respond within 20 working days but subsequently informed the complainant that the information was held by the Land Registry. Although the Decision Notice did not identify any steps to be taken, the College were advised how to deal with any future requests where information is either not held by them or is reasonably accessible by other means. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/68238 | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/68238 dn.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
Latest revision as of 23:22, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50068238
- Date: 9 June 2005
- Public Authority: West Cheshire College
- Summary: Complainant requested information relating to a proposed move by the College. The College failed to respond within 20 working days but subsequently informed the complainant that the information was held by the Land Registry. Although the Decision Notice did not identify any steps to be taken, the College were advised how to deal with any future requests where information is either not held by them or is reasonably accessible by other means.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: dn.pdf
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 1 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
