FS50061644: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50061644 | |dn_ref=FS50061644 | ||
|dn_date=16 | |dn_date=16 May 2005 | ||
|dn_pa=Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency | |dn_pa=Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency | ||
|dn_summary=Complainant requested information relating to the handling of complaints by MHRA. MHRA failed to inform the complainant in writing and within 20 working days stating whether the information was held. The Agency did, however, then provide some of the information and confirmed that the remainder was not held. The Decision Notice was issued to this effect - recognising, where possible, that information had been provided, but that this was not done in writing within 20 working days. | |dn_summary=Complainant requested information relating to the handling of complaints by MHRA. MHRA failed to inform the complainant in writing and within 20 working days stating whether the information was held. The Agency did, however, then provide some of the information and confirmed that the remainder was not held. The Decision Notice was issued to this effect - recognising, where possible, that information had been provided, but that this was not done in writing within 20 working days. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/61644 | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/61644 dn v2.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
Latest revision as of 23:22, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50061644
- Date: 16 May 2005
- Public Authority: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency
- Summary: Complainant requested information relating to the handling of complaints by MHRA. MHRA failed to inform the complainant in writing and within 20 working days stating whether the information was held. The Agency did, however, then provide some of the information and confirmed that the remainder was not held. The Decision Notice was issued to this effect - recognising, where possible, that information had been provided, but that this was not done in writing within 20 working days.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: dn v2.pdf
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
