FS50259647: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50259647 | |dn_ref=FS50259647 | ||
|dn_date= | |dn_date=3 February 2010 | ||
|dn_pa=BBC | |dn_pa=BBC | ||
|dn_summary= the purposes of journalism, art or literature. The Commissioner is satisfied that the information in question was held to a significant extent for the purposes of journalism, art or literature. Therefore the BBC was not obliged to comply with Parts I to V of the Act. | |dn_summary=The complainant made an information request to the British Broadcasting Corporation (the “BBC”) for information about complaints from viewers, victims and insiders made to it in connection with a Panorama investigation. The BBC refused to provide the requested information claiming that it was outside the scope of the Freedom of Information Act (“the Act”) because it was held for the purposes of journalism, art or literature. The Commissioner is satisfied that the information in question was held to a significant extent for the purposes of journalism, art or literature. Therefore the BBC was not obliged to comply with Parts I to V of the Act. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50259647.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50259647.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:40, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50259647
- Date: 3 February 2010
- Public Authority: BBC
- Summary: The complainant made an information request to the British Broadcasting Corporation (the “BBC”) for information about complaints from viewers, victims and insiders made to it in connection with a Panorama investigation. The BBC refused to provide the requested information claiming that it was outside the scope of the Freedom of Information Act (“the Act”) because it was held for the purposes of journalism, art or literature. The Commissioner is satisfied that the information in question was held to a significant extent for the purposes of journalism, art or literature. Therefore the BBC was not obliged to comply with Parts I to V of the Act.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 1 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
