FS50070856: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 23:23, 15 May 2010

Case Ref: FS50070856
Date: 9 November 2005
Public Authority: Ministry of Defence
Summary: The complainant requested the signature of a former serviceman from the MoD, who responded by stating that the signature was not held. The complainant disputed this statement and the Commissioner asked the MoD for further information to satisfy himself that the information was not held. The MoD provided evidence of appropriate records management procedures and policies and so the Commissioner did not uphold the complaint.
View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 1 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{DNSummaryBox
 |dn_ref=FS50070856
-|dn_date=09/11/2005
+|dn_date=9 November 2005
 |dn_pa=Ministry of Defence
-|dn_summary=The complainant requested the signature of a former serviceman from the MoD, who responded by stating that the signature was not held. The complainant disputed this statement and the Commissioner asked the MoD for further information to satisfy himself that the information was not held. The MoD provided�evidence of appropriate records management procedures and policies�and so the Commissioner did not uphold the complaint.
+|dn_summary=The complainant requested the signature of a former serviceman from the MoD, who responded by stating that the signature was not held. The complainant disputed this statement and the Commissioner asked the MoD for further information to satisfy himself that the information was not held. The MoD provided evidence of appropriate records management procedures and policies and so the Commissioner did not uphold the complaint.
 |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/decision_notice_70856.pdf
 }}
 {{DNDecision
-|1=FOI 1
+|dnd_section=FOI 1
-|2=Not upheld
+|dnd_finding=Not upheld
 }}