FS50197501: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:23, 3 May 2010

Case Ref: FS50197501
Date: 29/06/2009
Public Authority: Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Summary: the named doctor. The Commissioner does not require the Trust to take any further steps in relation to the complainant’s request.
View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 1 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{DNSummaryBox
+	{{DNSummaryBox
 |dn_ref=FS50197501
 |dn_date=29/06/2009
 |dn_pa=Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
-|dn_summary=The complainant made a request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the �Act�) to the Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (the �Trust�) for specific information relating to a counter-fraud investigation into a named doctor. The Trust confirmed or denied whether it held that information under section 1(1)(a) of the Act. After considering the case, the Commissioner�s decision is that the Trust was excluded even from its duty to respond to the request under section 1(1)(a) by virtue of the provisions of section 40(5)(b)(i) because, in responding to the request, it had to disclose information which constitutes sensitive personal data of the named doctor. The Commissioner does not require the Trust to take any further steps in relation to the complainant�s request.
+|dn_summary=the named doctor. The Commissioner does not require the Trust to take any further steps in relation to the complainant’s request.
 |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50197501.pdf
 }}
 {{DNDecision
-|1=FOI 40
+|dnd_section=FOI 1
-|2=Not upheld
+|dnd_finding=Not upheld
+}}
+{{DNDecision
+|dnd_section=FOI 40
+|dnd_finding=Not upheld
 }}