FS50147863: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50147863 | |dn_ref=FS50147863 | ||
|dn_date=17/04/2007 | |dn_date=17/04/2007 | ||
|dn_pa=Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust | |dn_pa=Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary=d. The Commissioner also decided that the public authority was in breach of section 17, as the initial refusal notice was inadequate. Consequently, the complaint was upheld. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50147863.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50147863.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 22:09, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50147863
- Date: 17/04/2007
- Public Authority: Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust
- Summary: d. The Commissioner also decided that the public authority was in breach of section 17, as the initial refusal notice was inadequate. Consequently, the complaint was upheld.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions