FS50278215: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
XML import
m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision"
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50278215
|dn_ref=FS50278215
|dn_date=21/12/2009
|dn_date=21 December 2009
|dn_pa=BBC
|dn_pa=BBC
|dn_summary=“the Act”) because it was held for the purposes of journalism, art or literature. The Commissioner is satisfied that the information in question was held for the purpose of journalism, art and literature. Therefore the BBC was not obliged to comply with Parts I to V of the Act.
|dn_summary=The complainant made an information request to the British Broadcasting Corporation (the “BBC”) for all documents relating to the Live Aid concert of 13 July 1985. The BBC voluntarily provided part of this information but refused to provide access to the remainder stating that it was outside the scope of the Freedom of Information Act (“the Act”) because it was held for the purposes of journalism, art or literature. The Commissioner is satisfied that the information in question was held for the purpose of journalism, art and literature. Therefore the BBC was not obliged to comply with Parts I to V of the Act.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50278215.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50278215.pdf
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:40, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50278215
  • Date: 21 December 2009
  • Public Authority: BBC
  • Summary: The complainant made an information request to the British Broadcasting Corporation (the “BBC”) for all documents relating to the Live Aid concert of 13 July 1985. The BBC voluntarily provided part of this information but refused to provide access to the remainder stating that it was outside the scope of the Freedom of Information Act (“the Act”) because it was held for the purposes of journalism, art or literature. The Commissioner is satisfied that the information in question was held for the purpose of journalism, art and literature. Therefore the BBC was not obliged to comply with Parts I to V of the Act.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]