FS50235169: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50235169 | |dn_ref=FS50235169 | ||
|dn_date=27 | |dn_date=27 October 2009 | ||
|dn_pa=Lancashire County Council | |dn_pa=Lancashire County Council | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested care records relating to her deceased relative. The public authority responded that it did not hold the requested information as it had been lost. The complainant asked the Commissioner to consider whether the records were held. The Commissioner has determined that on the balance of probabilities the information is no longer held by the public authority. However, he did find a procedural breach of section 10(1). He does not require any remedial steps to be taken in this case. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested care records relating to her deceased relative. The public authority responded that it did not hold the requested information as it had been lost. The complainant asked the Commissioner to consider whether the records were held. The Commissioner has determined that on the balance of probabilities the information is no longer held by the public authority. However, he did find a procedural breach of section 10(1). He does not require any remedial steps to be taken in this case. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
|1=FOI 10 | |dnd_section=FOI 1 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 10 | |||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:39, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50235169
- Date: 27 October 2009
- Public Authority: Lancashire County Council
- Summary: The complainant requested care records relating to her deceased relative. The public authority responded that it did not hold the requested information as it had been lost. The complainant asked the Commissioner to consider whether the records were held. The Commissioner has determined that on the balance of probabilities the information is no longer held by the public authority. However, he did find a procedural breach of section 10(1). He does not require any remedial steps to be taken in this case.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 1 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
