FS50197501: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
 
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50197501
|dn_ref=FS50197501
|dn_date=29/06/2009
|dn_date=29 June 2009
|dn_pa=Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
|dn_pa=Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
|dn_summary=The complainant made a request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the �Act�) to the Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (the �Trust�) for specific information relating to a counter-fraud investigation into a named doctor. The Trust confirmed or denied whether it held that information under section 1(1)(a) of the Act. After considering the case, the Commissioner�s decision is that the Trust was excluded even from its duty to respond to the request under section 1(1)(a) by virtue of the provisions of section 40(5)(b)(i) because, in responding to the request, it had to disclose information which constitutes sensitive personal data of the named doctor. The Commissioner does not require the Trust to take any further steps in relation to the complainant�s request.
|dn_summary=The complainant made a request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the “Act”) to the Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (the “Trust”) for specific information relating to a counter-fraud investigation into a named doctor. The Trust confirmed or denied whether it held that information under section 1(1)(a) of the Act. After considering the case, the Commissioner’s decision is that the Trust was excluded even from its duty to respond to the request under section 1(1)(a) by virtue of the provisions of section 40(5)(b)(i) because, in responding to the request, it had to disclose information which constitutes sensitive personal data of the named doctor. The Commissioner does not require the Trust to take any further steps in relation to the complainant’s request.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50197501.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50197501.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 40
|dnd_section=FOI 1
|2=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 40
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:37, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50197501
  • Date: 29 June 2009
  • Public Authority: Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • Summary: The complainant made a request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the “Act”) to the Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (the “Trust”) for specific information relating to a counter-fraud investigation into a named doctor. The Trust confirmed or denied whether it held that information under section 1(1)(a) of the Act. After considering the case, the Commissioner’s decision is that the Trust was excluded even from its duty to respond to the request under section 1(1)(a) by virtue of the provisions of section 40(5)(b)(i) because, in responding to the request, it had to disclose information which constitutes sensitive personal data of the named doctor. The Commissioner does not require the Trust to take any further steps in relation to the complainant’s request.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Retrieved from "https://foiwiki.com/foiwiki/index.php?title=FS50197501&oldid=16976"